> I have interviewed twice at Google now and it seems pretty par for the course.
I had a phone screen with Google earlier this year and it had great audio quality and used a shared Google Doc.
It is really sad to hear that you and others are having such a different experience.
I wonder if the quality of people's interviews are affected by the location and position they're interviewing for. I was interviewing for a smaller location instead of the main campus.
It is also worth noting that apps are only given access to scan for beacons if they have location services enabled. To be tracked using iBeacon, you have to download an app that scans for the correct UUID and have location services enabled for that app.
Cool. I incorrectly took your statement about “earlier in the research process” to mean this particular research process.
You mention unexplored gender-related differences: an interesting example that came up recently was gender differences in depth perception and how it relates to VR.
Kentucky is 86% white non-hispanic (the 8th highest percentage in the US), and they still had to pull candidates from outside the state for their initial four subjects. I think it is perfectly reasonable for them to wait until they have a first round of results before expending the effort to expand the inclusiveness of the group.
Now that this is out there, others will start trying to reproduce the results and I'm sure we'll see research extend to other demographics.
I had a phone screen with Google earlier this year and it had great audio quality and used a shared Google Doc. It is really sad to hear that you and others are having such a different experience.
I wonder if the quality of people's interviews are affected by the location and position they're interviewing for. I was interviewing for a smaller location instead of the main campus.