HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

fabioperez

no profile record

Submissions

[untitled]

1 points·by fabioperez·4 ay önce·0 comments

Show HN: Exodus – we tracked 240 moves across companies to map the AI talent war

7min.ai
1 points·by fabioperez·4 ay önce·0 comments

Seven Models in Three Weeks: China's AI Labs Aren't Waiting

7min.ai
2 points·by fabioperez·5 ay önce·1 comments

Show HN: 7min.ai – no-BS AI news aggregator curated by AI

7min.ai
1 points·by fabioperez·5 ay önce·0 comments

comments

fabioperez
·4 ay önce·discuss
Another data point for https://7min.ai/exodus/, where I track all relevant AI talent moves. It's the second big move from OpenAI in a week, after Max Schwarzer.
fabioperez
·5 ay önce·discuss
Great to see more SaaS for Brazil! The website looks great!
fabioperez
·5 ay önce·discuss
Good read! Thanks!

I tried to access the GitHub code but I'm getting 404. Are you planning to release it? https://github.com/grith-ai/grith
fabioperez
·5 ay önce·discuss
Congrats on the launch! I will give it a try. I'm running a web site with AI news, so this may land well. Do you have plans for a more premium tier with even more natural voices? I wanted to have a podcast for my newsletter but most TTS solutions don't feel natural.
fabioperez
·5 ay önce·discuss
Chinese labs shipped seven major models in the past three weeks:

Moonshot AI → Kimi K2.5 (coordinates 100 sub-agents in parallel)

z.ai → GLM-5 (lowest hallucination rate on Artificial Analysis, runs on Huawei chips)

MiniMax → M2.5 (80.2% on SWE-bench, claims ~1/10th cost of Claude Opus per task)

ByteDance → Seedance 2.0 (4K video) + Seed 2.0 (powers Doubao, 155M weekly users)

Kuaishou → Kling 3.0 (native 4K 60fps video)

Alibaba → Qwen 3.5 (397B/17B MoE, claims to beat GPT-5.2 on 80% of benchmarks)

Four of five text models are open-weight under MIT or Apache 2.0. All use MoE architectures. All under $1/M input tokens. For comparison: Claude Opus is $5 and GPT-5.2 is $1.75.

The other thing worth paying attention to: every lab is building for agents now, not chatbots. Kimi K2.5 runs 100 sub-agents in parallel. Qwen 3.5 controls apps from screenshots. ByteDance calls Seed 2.0 their "agent era" model.

Most of these scores are vendor-reported, so grain of salt. But even discounting the benchmarks by 10-15%, the pricing difference is hard to explain away.

So what actually justifies paying 5-10x more for Western models? Reliability? Safety? And honestly, how much do you trust vendor-reported benchmarks here?

Curious to see if anyone has compared the Chinese models with Opus 4.6 or GPT-5.2 to see how well they do.
fabioperez
·5 ay önce·discuss
It's kinda dumb to use LLMs to generate passwords, but I guess people will just do it, right? Also, vibe coding can just generate passwords without the users even knowing they exist.

Pretty cool analysis, I specially liked the graphics!
fabioperez
·5 ay önce·discuss
That's cool! Do you have anything that makes the articles not sound like AI?