falseprofit

14 gün öncediscuss

Maybe it isn’t changing mass at all, and what’s changing is just the probability distribution resulting from a hypothetical flavor measurement. If we could measure the mass (collapse to mass eigenstate), I think I understand we would see no oscillation.

falseprofit

15 gün öncediscuss

Not a physicist, but here are a couple Wikipedia excerpts I found: From page “Conservation of mass”:

“In general, mass is not conserved. The conservation of mass is a law that holds only in the classical limit.”

From page “Neutrino oscillation”:

“Neutrino oscillation arises from mixing between the flavor and mass eigenstates of neutrinos. That is, the three neutrino states that interact with the charged leptons in weak interactions are each a different superposition of the three (propagating) neutrino states of definite mass. Neutrinos are produced and detected in weak interactions as flavour eigenstates[a] but propagate as coherent superpositions of mass eigenstates.[23]”

falseprofit

2 ay öncediscuss

The contest has a cash prize. Why did you put the university name in quotes?

falseprofit

2 ay öncediscuss

Professor Simonton, quoted here, seems to be confused about what is meant by Shakespeare’s “problem plays”.

falseprofit

3 ay öncediscuss

Is this article just plagiarized from the Reuters one from the day before?

https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/judge-now-dismisses...

falseprofit

6 ay öncediscuss

The U.S. itself has been engaging in similar behavior around the world for a long time. The specific relevance of Israel may only be a combination of recency and amount of U.S. attention.

But “scapegoat”?

“Israel did 9/11” is treating them as a scapegoat. “IDF often calls men they killed terrorists with no justification” is just stating a fact.

falseprofit

7 ay öncediscuss

Hey, do you mind sharing any of these other forums? I’m trying to make my way up the satire food chain.

falseprofit

7 ay öncediscuss

I would guess that was not a joke. The benefits could drop all the way to 0 at a reasonable point unless you impose the stronger condition that the function be analytic.

falseprofit

8 ay öncediscuss

I actually agree with your premise of ruling out “not at all”. I was just responding to your characterization of “if ever”.

I’m not quite as certain as you are, though. Just because a technology is possible does not mean it is inevitable.

falseprofit

8 ay öncediscuss

Let’s say there are three options: {soon, later, not at all}. Ruling out only one to arrive at {later, not at all} implies less knowledge than ruling out two and asserting {later}.

Awareness of a fundamental limitation would eliminate possibilities to just {not at all}, and the phrasing would be “never”, rather than “not soon, if ever”.

falseprofit

8 ay öncediscuss

Computing, they propose

falseprofit

8 ay öncediscuss

Not being forced to open a joint account either…

In all seriousness, all the pushback against paternalism comes from people who still believe in free will.

falseprofit

9 ay öncediscuss

That’s the next guy’s job to pressure wash it off ;)

falseprofit

10 ay öncediscuss

Can you explain the correct interpretation? Asking for a friend.

falseprofit

10 ay öncediscuss

The phrasing was matter of fact. And there is nothing inherently wrong with reposting. Certain other websites have developed a culture opposed to it, but I have yet to see that here.

comments