talkback is a slack extension that helps teams improve their meetings.
In the past, my team often had habitual meetings that were largely inefficient. Then, we talked about it. From talking with other teams, we were unique — most teams don't talk about their meeting processes.
Talkback helps teams talk about their experiences via a slack app. Any team member can visit their dashboard to see how effective their meetings are and can begin to consider what needs to change.
This is an interesting take — I don't disagree that these sorts of things happen, but in this case, the author clearly felt his work was paid for fairly.
I think one's own perspective is a pretty key regulator of what's fair and what's not. Perhaps not in the macro level, but on a case by case basis. Is the author's point of view incorrect in your eyes? Who else should be able to decide that, other than the person who experienced it?