There is nothing to hide if there is no data collected in the first place. Here in this video, you can see that even injuries sustained by people who took part in the trials are being rejected by the doctors citing as caused by "anxiety".
I think people are completely oblivious to this issue, and is under this fallacy that if there was something wrong with the vaccines, then the information will automatically appear in public perception. If you think this, you need to only look at how smoking went on for a long time without the people noticing any problem with it.
With vaccines, we know that the signal is killed right at the point of generation, because the medical practicioners are conditioned (being charitable here) to reject any injury as not being caused by the Vaccines.
The risks of Vaccines is not limited to the AEFI caused by a proper preparation of the Vaccine, but also include the problems with manufacturing such as this as well...
Getting the Vaccine is easy. What is hard is to trust the what every biased, safety studies done on it and the fact the AEFI reporting system is not strictly mandated, indicating a bias from the authorities to not want to know about potential vaccine injuries.
As usual, this comment will get flagged. If you see this comment check back a bit later to see the shilling on HN.
>I mean that groups without any conflict of interest can gather population level data and evaluate for themselves how effective the vaccines are,
It won't work because for every such group, there will be 10 groups with high conflict of interest that can counter any finding of your hypothetical group, and journals with conflict of interests will reject the findings of that group, but instead give high visibility to the reports of high-conflict of interest groups..
Quickly no one will dare to research the said topic.
Because that would be like saying, just because all you got is a binocular with very limited magnification/resolving power, satelites for jupiter does not exist, because you cannot see them through it.
>The beauty of science is that now that the vaccines are out there it becomes easier to independently access them and move our knowledge further in the right direction.
>I am pretty sure Sputnik V is fine. It has been administered to tens of millions inside Russia itself. If there were massive problems with it, we would know by now.
No, we wouldn't. Because most of the Vaccine AEFI tracking is based on voluntary reporting, and is known to only report around 1% of the events.
Even if it was not the case, we wouldn't still know without a control group. Basically this is why systematic trials are done to measure these things.
So this logic does not absolve Sputnik vaccine, or any other current vaccines in use.
Much more likely is that what they were putting out was simply the truth, and people who didn't like it were calling it propaganda and mis-information...
Can someone tell me why VAERS reports are not strictly mandated for all observed AEFIs?
Anyone who says vaccines are safe, when there is no method to strictly monitor observed AEFIs, is perpetuating a blatent lie.
Without people having an option to reject a vaccine, and without an option to claim liability, and without an efficient AEFI monitoring in place, there is absolutely little incentive for the vaccine producers to ensure the quality. The is economics 101. It is sad that such blatant deceptions are possible in todays world...
And people who are refusing to bend down is fighting against this eventuality...shame on the shills who are making propoganda where they are cutting the branch they are sitting on...
There is nothing to hide if there is no data collected in the first place. Here in this video, you can see that even injuries sustained by people who took part in the trials are being rejected by the doctors citing as caused by "anxiety".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mxqC9SiRh8
I think people are completely oblivious to this issue, and is under this fallacy that if there was something wrong with the vaccines, then the information will automatically appear in public perception. If you think this, you need to only look at how smoking went on for a long time without the people noticing any problem with it.
With vaccines, we know that the signal is killed right at the point of generation, because the medical practicioners are conditioned (being charitable here) to reject any injury as not being caused by the Vaccines.