Wiz is closer to the CNAPP field instead of the software composition analysis tools you mention, Snyk would fit here for SCA.
Sysdig, Palo Alto's Prisma Cloud, or a few others compete with Wiz's CNAPP offering. Wiz also strays into some SCA and SCA-alike tooling for containers, code or XDR with their CDR/XDR products log ingest and agents available for response/quarantine.
Yes folks do and I can't understand it either. Have asked / talked through their rationale but frankly humans are irrational is my clear takeaway. I experience it mostly when folks are prompting search in family settings. These usually overlap with the no-earbuds watch-videos crowd while others are reading / napping, etc.
Bitwarden for usability. Vaultwarden if you can and prefer to self host. Being on the internet you'll have to trust someone at some point. Can reduce risk by combining strong 2FA (not SMS/Email) alongside backing up your vault.
Ensure all your passwords get reset at some point after vaulting, long randomly generated from Bitwarden extension/app is easy enough. Ensure you enable strong 2FA at each service you have an account at too.
Based on this it sounds like you exposed your resource and advertised it for others. Reverse dns, get IP, scan IP.
Probably simpler, you exposed resource on IPV4 publicly, if it exists, it'll be scanned. There's probably 100s of companies scanning entire 0.0.0.0/0 space at all times.
1. Is github the best place to report bugs / issues for Waterfox?
2. When (not in your lifetime obviously) Waterfox is broken, what canaries do you have deployed that we can archive now, like Mozilla's tell here?
3. What keeps waterfox afloat? Where/how do you accept funds?
4. How do I find a sync alternative or provide my own? Such that, I'm not reliant on Mozilla sync/backend?
... If none exists, how much would it cost for you to embed one? Would you accept a serious bounty for it assuming the focus is self hosted / no Waterfox backend services?
Is the best counter here to acquire a brand tld to operate themselves (setting aside all the linkrot it generates)? They've certainly got the resources when you compare against other brand tlds that this could have been an option.
API based credentials are just username + password in this context, nothing else seems to be restricting access to data. So if your Snowflake tenant isn't enforcing IP restriction to limit source auth attempts, those creds can be used to pull the data from any source IP.
Even then, you'll still have an HTTP 403 response layer filtering those auth attempts based on IP... where we can assume these failed to implement it.
So far between TechCrunch, Wired, and other reporting it seems most claim creds get owned, sold, then used against under-restrictive Snowflake tenants which are exposed by default.