HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

karianna

no profile record

comments

karianna
·6 ay önce·discuss
Hard agree on the data waste, noise to signal ratio is typically very high and processing, shipping and storing all of that data costs a ton.

Previous start-up I worked on (jClarity, exited to Microsoft) mitigated much of this by having a model of only collecting the tiny amount of data that really mattered for a performance bottleneck investigation in a ring buffer and only processing / shipping and storing that data if a bottleneck trigger occurred (+ occasional baselines).

It allowed our product at the time (Illuminate to run at massive scale without costing our customers an arm and a leg or impacting their existing infrastructure. We charged on the value of the product reducing MTTR and not on how much data was being chucked around.

There was the constant argument against approach of always on observably or “collect all data JIC”, but with a good model (in our case something called the Java Performance Diagnostic Method) we never missed having the noise
karianna
·7 ay önce·discuss
Usual caveats of “you should run load to see if it’s truly wasted”, but we do know that Java defaults are not ideal out of the box and so we analysed a ton of workloads on Azure and came up with this: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/java/jaz - better defaults out of the box for the JVM in containers at runtime.
karianna
·8 ay önce·discuss
I wonder if statistically (hand waving here, I’m so not an expert in this field) the SOTA models do as much or as little harm as their human counterparts in terms of providing safe and effective emotional support. Totally agree we should better understand the risks and trade offs but I wouldn’t be super surprised if they are statistically no worse than us meat bags this kind of stuff.