I respect your insightful approach. I think it’s possible to make that argument, but I’d love to hear why you think Elon’s is even comparable. What’s your insight there?
Just building off what you are saying and trying to find a way around it.
Possibly an alternative could be to offer a bounty on a top you use and if needs x item patched. Instead of getting an interval to do it they could offer it to candidates. This would mean these external patches that often distract internal teams in big companies but are necessary could be turned into hiring opportunities. This wouldn’t totally resolve the problem you pointed out, but perhaps it would give more companies the chance to leverage that option. No?
This basically made me disinterested in going to Reddit. I used to be a casual user, but now I can’t even delete my posts and that just is a line I won’t tolerate
I don’t believe anything the western media says, so many obvious lies that when they could be telling the truth you have to wonder at the very least how much is a lie and no I’m not saying the Russians and the rest don’t lie to, but i do have higher expectations of our media than others and I don’t think I’m alone in that expectation.
This is a good question and the move would probably precipitate a move towards an agnostic model and away from a mobile platform centric model. Let’s hope you receive a favourable answer
The person who wrote this article is rather despicable as a human being.
techbros?
Rich tech?
Bailing out their own sector?
Mainstream media is just disgusting how badly they do their job.
Who do they think those VCs fund? Rich tech barons? No, not even close, but we all know that and it’s just disgusting to see this article here with its totally dishonest take on the SVB situation.
I’m a web dev and I’m wondering if there is really any practical way of levelling up to become an ML Engineer. Seems there are ‘schools’ out there but based on what I read on Hacker News these places won’t remotely prepare me to make that transition.
Not complaining just would appreciate some of your thoughts on what are good options to consider to make that leap.
Lacking in even a basic understanding of the world that they can only name Putin. So so many options!! American culture now is so insular that they can only tear themselves down for the smallest infraction.
Wishing this wasn’t a WSJ article, but reading the first part sounds really spooky, because they are asking for journalist names and I don’t see why that’s relevant to an FTC investigation. Seems like government overreach to me, but admittedly I’m only superficially aware of the issues
Toyota is under stating it because they don’t want to draw the attention of the green mob. Hybrid with a fully electric drive train is the best and most efficient vehicle choice for the environment and consumer in most cases. Sorry I don’t have a link, feel free to ignore me for not having a source.
I 100% agree with you, except I do BELIEVE hybrids are less polluting than both options. Reduce gas by 90% since most communites are around 25 miles. That means a battery that’s 1/10th size, which means mining is substantially lower. Toxic metals also need to be considered and often are not.
The problem I think other people forget is that we don’t actually need to end fossil fuels we just need to substantially reduce the amount we burn. So if vehicles were 90% more efficient then that’s basically all we need in that sector anyway.
Great comment Bruce! I’m glad I wasn’t the only one thinking like you.