Hey, uhm not arresting people for drugs is probably because they are in the pocket of drug dealers or politicians who are in the pocket of dealers.
Anyways sheriffs do shady things all the time, like money seizures and home foreclosures and tenet eviction. All of which are typically tied to shady business practices, unethical eviction, robber baron rent hikes.
Not sure about most of the US (well I kind of am) but in New York that is how it is. Everything is corrupt when elections and money and power is involved and sometimes the wrong people have injustice strikes against them.
Unfortunately public elections don’t mean much as to convince a populous of people to elect the right way is an impossible task by two fold.
A) any candidate you elect will have to succumb to tradition and president set by the office previously, especially when finances are considered.
B) even if the running platform is maintained getting a candidate who can do such and getting the populous to back the candidate will be an arduous task.
I read this and wonder if the technique can be applied to space. Too bad we can’t take photos of a closing distance of something 50 million light years away.
I wonder if the algorithm would become better if not only did author did the swim closer but also took pictures of different path distances and angles simultaneously and map images together. Maybe it will reveal some of the editing work on hazy objects took a little more liberty and will produce more accurate images.
I’m literally describing creating more flow lines which would cause an exponential growth in acceleration measured without really exceeding certain values.
Don’t understand the downvoted when I asked for more information and said my maths are probably wrong.
But that doesn’t make sense. Here space expands n.
Go a distance d away and now you have nd! So if we were to integrate the summation of nd!+V (velocity vector) Spaces, wouldn’t the relationship not be linear? You have an infinite amount of points between A and B. Each point expands at v. Each time point pk+1 is created you are introducing a new expansion that will then add as many expansions as are vector / dimensions at play.
I know my maths is not very accurate and maybe you can help correct my understanding. It just seems adding up each point that creates even more expanding points would never be a linear function.
> Goettsche, Weeks, and others conspired to solicit investments in BitClub Network by providing false and misleading figures that BitClub investors were told were “bitcoin mining earnings,” purportedly generated by BitClub Network’s bitcoin mining pool. Goettsche discussed with his conspirators that their target audience would be “dumb” investors, referred to them as “sheep,” and said he was “building this whole model on the backs of idiots.” Goettsche directed others to manipulate the figures displayed as “mining earnings” during the course of the conspiracy.
Come on, how dumb do you have to be to leave a paper trail in emails of your blatant attempt to defraud investors.
I mean it’s a pretty impressive scheme that in light of all the Ponzi schemes and MLM these guys were able to convince others to invest, especially in a technology that is totally anonymous with no real way to see what is actually going on behind the scenes.
I read it thinking the created a real crypto and dumped all the currency into one account and transferred it out. I am surprised the scheme was way less sophisticated in terms of implementation.
Exactly. Egypt is a great case study. I’m not too privy on recent events but the protests that spun from Facebook proves exactly that. There was some change at least for a little while...
HK is another example of how technology has helped shed light which led to protests.
Kranzberg six laws of technology should ease your mind.
You don’t need MRI’s to manipulate people. Knowing basic psychology and allowing yourself some time to learn about them will allow the same effect. I understand you are saying mass produced, with data science applying these learning models to groups of people is easy enough.
You know why political campaigning on social media is effective? It’s because they take a best fit approach. You find clustered of people, and identify the one most easily manipulated. It won’t be long till they start to push the agenda fed through IV to their peers. Maybe 2/10 are dissenters and won’t listen. Maybe another 2/10 are as stubborn as the opposite agenda and won’t listen. So you are left with 6/10 people who are more likely to be convinced from someone they know rather than political advertisements. Especially if the IV being fed to best fit manipulator has disarm tactics for the opposites agenda, regardless of how true the disarm tactic is.
There was a time where you had to go to town hall, listen to the radio, and read the news paper. Even then, you were probably likely to find the same tactics maybe less pruned to actual manipulation and closer to the parties real ideologies.
Every technology has a cost benefit analysis. Do not let this stop progress. Stopping technological progress is the worst thing we can do because humans are evolving and growing and the technology is needed to keep up with the numbers.
Some of the argument may have fallen apart in the middle I’m more than willing to discuss further to clear up any anomalies...
I added information about how it is useful. What I was saying is how in the study of the puddle you will never find the real, in the example given, human, experience. One is only to find an extrapolated system of movement none of which describes the motivation for the puddle reflection of Jill to move quick, only the cause of her quick movement. Some correlation may be found but we must remember correlation does not imply causation. No part of the image can show Jills son waiting after soccer practice in the rain because Jill forgot to pick him up which led to her rushing which led to the car accident to begin with.
I did however agree that there are many benefits from the pursuit, I guess I was trying to attest to the limitations of a finite resource driven society.