If you run it through originality.ai, you'll see that bits of it are his writing, some is mixed and some is just ai. This blog post everyone is discussing is also written with ai.
if there's 0.00% similarity for canvas, then I think there would be some issue with the letterboxing. You shouldn't resize your tor window from 1400x900. Tor pretends it's windows, so I don't know why it would do that for the useragent.
I've always used it inside of whonix, and when I tested it, it seemed like everything was fine.
When you disable js you need to do so by setting tor to Safest.
The font list should be spoofed by tor?
Anyway, you can fix all of that just by using whonix and setting tor to safest.
> Ironically, the more fine tuned and hardened your device, OS, and browser are for security and privacy, the worse your fingerprint liability becomes.
1. You could (however, I doubt the effectiveness) use something like brave which tries to randomize your fingerprint.
2. You could "blend in with the crowd" and use tor.
> Apple’s obsession with privacy and security is the reason most of us don’t think twice to scan our faces, store bank account information or share our real-time location via our phones.
Uh do you have any freaking idea of what happens with your location data? bank account information is a matter of security. So is face ID data.
Lmarena.ai is a very accurate eval (with stylecontrol). Other benchmarks like AIME and whatever can be trained on/optimized for and therefore should not be trusted. Most ai companies do something fishy to boost their benchmark scores.
> Users don’t pay for Chrome. There aren’t ads in Chrome. There is no direct business model for Chrome. Unlike Safari and Firefox, nobody writes checks to Chrome to make a certain search engine the default.
They track you. There IS a business model for Chrome: monetizing user data.