If you are in an environment where deploying a new configuration file is easier than adding data in a pre-existing database, you are in a bad place already.
> the biggest blocker on moving to a new programming language, is the cost of re-writing everything
In 2026, not sure if it was satire. Do some people truly believe that all their software stack has to be single tech, from device drivers to end user apps? Does that extend to remotely accessed services?
Explain again why a cli can't access a remote service ?
The only difference that is not superficial is the token count. Everything else : format, doc, auth, discoverability, ... can be made the same (the cli could be an mcp client, and the mcp server could implement a local shell, after all)
And you believe the State of Spain decided to blacklist Palentir for these reasons ? Because that was the original question of the person you are replying to.
Understood your situation, but personnaly I'm not watching so much professional content on YT; actually, I'm not watching YT as much as I used to when the service was young and unprofessional.
What I want from such a platform is authenticity... and curation.
Please do not see any malice in this naive question, but why is that an obsolete model?
Back in the days I had very different displays that I could use to display various windows of a flight simulator (some dedicated to some instruments, the big one for the front view, for instance) and it was quite nice. It sounds like that would not be easy to replicate with a single shared frame buffer, but maybe I'm wrong (I've been using nothing but a small laptop screen for decades)
Ultimately, I find it likely that TLS will become a tool to prevent users from accessing foreign content (browsers stubbornly refusing to show untrusted sites in the name of security, slowly getting there), more than a tool to prevent eavesdropping on users secrets.