A small site I made which randomly displays organizations that are or help those under threat in the USA in 2017 and beyond.
Basically, I got so frustrated watching the news all the time, I wanted something as close to an easy button in terms of listing ways I can support groups that need our help.
By coincidence I made a site to direct people to various charities on HN when this post came up - it went nowhere of course.
If you're looking for an option to support other charities w/o feeling like you're actually just buttressing a corporation's branding --> https://helpsavetheusa.com/
OK, so to be nice and avoid haha jokes about logical flaws, I'm reading that your argument is this --> that the article is "fundamentally a self-serving and dishonest narrative".
The only point you offer that relates to your actual argument is the author of the article is the CEO of kickstarter, so his promotion of less monolithic industries is ultimately self serving given that he profits off them - which is an interesting one but I'd contest that with the history and focus of kickstarter and their lack of employing any monopoly strategy.
By limiting entries to simple projects, not allowing anything purely political / fundraising driven, Kickstarter allowed for a vast sea of other crowdfunding sites to exist without ever threatening to take them or their market share over, despite Kickstarter being the site that popularized the crowfunding concept. The opposite of say, Uber's domination strategy, or a lot of other companies for that matter.
So... if I trust any company to express themselves without being self serving, it would be Kickstarter, for the reason that they had an opportunity to be the only major crowdfunding site, and chose not to based on what the founders wanted the company to be about.
hey look, an appearance from the amazing mr. strawman, capable of ignoring an argument's essence in favor of contradicting lesser points to appear correct, yet totally out of context! Amazing!
no mention of inflation in your link, only PPP. The article author also goes on to state that this isn't enough / as meaningful as you're making it out to be...
"And making sure everyone's making at least $1.25 a day isn't the end of the fight either. The world's median income is still only $3 to $4 a day. By comparison, the poverty line in the US for a family of four is $16.61 per person per day. Once under-$1.25-a-day poverty is eradicated, the world needs to set about eradicating under-$15-a-day poverty, which will be a substantially harder task."
Yeah I see "PPP" in the picture but nowhere is there an explanation of how they accounted and adjusted for inflation on a yearly basis. A link to the actual study would be a lot more informative. At any rate it doesn't address the moral concerns brought up in the article.
It doesn't seem like this chart takes inflation of the $ into account either, making it irrelevant over time. $1.25 was a lot more valuable even 30 years ago than it is today.
But... there's an abundance of internet quotes like "No other editor stands next to vim" (see parent comment), so I wanted to make sure the reader didn't think I was proselytizing.
One thing I've never heard from a manager at an in office gig - "my team is ultra motivated and always, without fault, executes on time. No problems there!"
My point being that with software development, even in an office, you'll still have to deal with lack of motivation and missing deadlines, and will never feel totally accomplished here. Working locations become a correlation, not a causation.
> But when you work remotely, you're basically advertising your work as commodity work. You're basically consistently reminding the company -- and the job market -- that you are substitutable.
You don't provide an argument for why working in an office provides what you are claiming remote workers to lack, nor do you provide evidence to backup your claim that remote workers are more replaceable.
> But at some point... the way you'll make value is by enabling others to build software; reading body language, detecting issues in a team; or negotiating; or motivating; or selling; etc.
If you can't do this through verbal communication and hangouts, maybe you should work on your communication skills as a manager - sometimes listening to the words people say is more reliable than making assumptions based on body positioning. On the flip side, maybe you should focus your hiring efforts on developers with strong communication skills, and enforce an evaluation period w/ new developers to see if they can meet the mustard in terms of remote communicating. Good developers don't communicate passively; they use their words and this can be assessed by good managers.
This is a great idea. The technical interview is indeed a skillset (on either side of the table) and it's great to see more efforts focused on educating people to do well with them.
So I'm a web developer. A few months ago I went through the job hunt process, and asked myself "What could be better about this?," and I came up with Hire Anonymously. (cool story; I know)
The basic idea is to help tech talent control their identity & ascertain critical job details like pay & location info before starting the interview process. So far basically just a signup to gauge interest.
Hoping to get feedback from the tech community on the concept, so I thought: "Why not Show HN?" (side note, I put this on Show HN and I'm pretty sure it's not appropriate as an email signup so I reposted).
Would really appreciate any thoughts you all have!
So I'm a web developer. A few months ago I went through the job hunt process, and asked myself "What could be better about this?," and I came up with Hire Anonymously. (cool story; I know)
The basic idea is to help tech talent control their identity & ascertain critical job details like pay & location info before starting the interview process.
Hoping to get feedback from the tech community on the concept, so I thought: "Why not Show HN?"
Would really appreciate any thoughts you all have!
While buying votes is probably illegal, I've had the same thought but instead of crowd funding to buy votes, we crowd fund to support politicians in elections, with one MAJOR stipulation -
Taking the money crowd funded means you can accept no other form of donations.
Just a thought, not related to We The Lobby, but perhaps a future project?
A small site I made which randomly displays organizations that are or help those under threat in the USA in 2017 and beyond.
Basically, I got so frustrated watching the news all the time, I wanted something as close to an easy button in terms of listing ways I can support groups that need our help.
Github is here, open to contributions and group additions: https://github.com/sankho/HelpSaveTheUSA