So does InDesign, which uses the TeX algorithm, QuarkXPress, and just about any other application that lays out text. Even Word! Think of that! A program far more suited to laying out a visual medium (i.e., a visual program) could be as good or better than a 35 year old programming language that has a default typeface that's pretty much the most hideous ever designed by humankind (Knuth couldn't have done a worse job on Computer Modern).
What does this post have to do with the topic? Why do we care what you've read over the past year? No one cares and you're not that special. Other people read too.
What people seem regularly to forget is that if you are not a US citizen, you have absolutely no right or privilege to enter the US. While the US may decide to extend you the courtesy of allowing you to enter the US, it does so in its sole and absolute discretion, and accordingly it may deny you entry for any or no reason at all. Acting like you have the right or privilege to enter the US as a non-citizen is silly and stupid.
You're not an American leaving the US, so your comment is irrelevant. And if the graduate school opportunity was at UMass, I assure you, it was not a very good department.
With respect to contract enforceability, writing is helpful for evidentiary purposes, but outside of a few specific areas governed by the statute of frauds, not required at all - an oral agreement is every bit as much a contract.
Judicial person is also correct. Also correct are fictitious person, artificial person or juristic person. In other words, no need for the "correction."
For those who understand English, the title should be: "Man turns 60, commits suicide and leaves a website as suicide note." Come on, let's try to get those nouns and verbs to agree -- or at least be consistent with the disagreement!
Refunds for anyone? I can't believe this guy asks for a donation to his legal defense fund. I already donated when I paid for a service that I now can't use. How do I go about getting a reverse donation -- i.e., a refund?
When and why would a lawyer be concerned with web-specific typography? I can't possibly imagine a lawyer ever needing to know about web-safe fonts or any other aspects of typography that are specific to the web.
Saying "clearly" is usually a sign that you're trying to avoid explaining why something is true. Could you explain why PRISM violates the original spirit of the 4th amendment? The 4th amendment is a very narrowly worded provision (when the founders knew how to write broadly worded provisions, e.g., the 1st amendment) and doesn't apply to third party records (when there were third party records during the 18th century, so the founders could have included them in the 4th amendment either explicitly or by broader drafting had they wanted to).
If you believe this is what happened, you need a much better understanding of the financial crisis. I suggest you try reading anything written by anyone, which would be certain to improve your existing knowledge.