Thank you! We'll get these bugs fixed asap. The board is mainly for subcontracting/delegating tasks to other devs so it asks for a separate funding source. I see where this is confusing and we will iterate accordingly. I really appreciate the feedback here.
Great point. You would actually use your standard contract with clients as you do now so your clause would still be active. We have a dispute process in place now if a client steals code without paying for it, it ultimately triggers an investigation and can impact client's reputation within our system.
Hi Maiku - we genuinely apologize for sending a negative first impression to you. Our goal was to receive feedback from as many developers as possible. While we didn't harvest emails from GitHub or StackOverflow, these emails were cold and we now understand this is not the best way to ask for feedback.
PRs are still attached to an hourly or flat rate that you and the client have agreed upon. This means you will not make more money for submitting more PRs. You just receive your payments sooner.
The client also approves your pull request to trigger the payout. The minute your code is accepted into their codebase you receive payment.
I'd love to hear more thoughts on your concern here and if this solves it, really great insight.