HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

xtacy

no profile record

Submissions

[untitled]

1 points·by xtacy·3 ay önce·0 comments

Performance Speed Limits (2019)

travisdowns.github.io
18 points·by xtacy·11 ay önce·1 comments

A whirlwind tutorial on creating teensy ELF executables for Linux (1999)

muppetlabs.com
59 points·by xtacy·geçen yıl·17 comments

comments

xtacy
·3 ay önce·discuss
Curious - what’s this court filing?
xtacy
·6 ay önce·discuss
> QUIC is not bad, but there are places where it either does not work at all or works too slow.

Curious: in your experience where does QUIC work bad/slow?
xtacy
·11 ay önce·discuss
Are there good public examples of well designed APIs that have stood the test of time?
xtacy
·11 ay önce·discuss
Is it GBps (gigabytes per second) or Gbps (giga bits per second)? I see mixed usage in this comment thread so I’m left wondering what it actually is.

The article is consistent and uses Gigabytes.
xtacy
·geçen yıl·discuss
We do have a model. That’s statistical physics.

Any standard course goes over various derivations of classical physics laws (Newtonian dynamics) from quantum mechanics.
xtacy
·5 yıl önce·discuss
I suspect that the web server's CPU usage will be pretty high (almost 100%), so C-state tuning may not matter as much?

EDIT: also, RSS happens on the NIC. RFS happens in the kernel, so it might not be as effective. For a uniform request workload like the one in the article, statically binding flows to a NIC queue should be sufficient. :)
xtacy
·7 yıl önce·discuss
I think you meant to say -- Type 1 is a false positive, and type 2 is a false negative.