[untitled]
6 comments
Good to see this being discussed. The tech still reflects the biases in its training data, and that’s a real issue for creative work. What would help is more concrete examples of failure cases and what actually works to reduce them in practice.
> Good to see this being discussed. The tech still reflects the biases in its training data, and that’s a real issue for creative work. What would help is more concrete examples of failure cases and what actually works to reduce them in practice.
What bias in the training data do you have in mind? Think about the top labs - what biases do you imagine them having in a big enough way that in meaningfully tilts the models in a bad way?
And then bringing it to the user; do you want everyone to think the same way by flattening the range of thought that is permissible and that the AI system would engage with? That seems awfully oppressive.
What bias in the training data do you have in mind? Think about the top labs - what biases do you imagine them having in a big enough way that in meaningfully tilts the models in a bad way?
And then bringing it to the user; do you want everyone to think the same way by flattening the range of thought that is permissible and that the AI system would engage with? That seems awfully oppressive.
The article used an example of Neo Nazi making a show using an AI.
In my opinion, AI generated future of entertainment will lead to less racism overall. This is because traditionally, movies and shows are expensive to produce and gated by mostly by Hollywood. With AI, making a show is magnitudes cheaper which will allow underrepresented groups to finally represent themselves.
In my opinion, AI generated future of entertainment will lead to less racism overall. This is because traditionally, movies and shows are expensive to produce and gated by mostly by Hollywood. With AI, making a show is magnitudes cheaper which will allow underrepresented groups to finally represent themselves.
a cute app
Any news outlet that is complaining about an AI generated future of content that they disagree with or find distasteful is not a news outlet worth keeping around or listening to. They clearly have failed competing on the merits of their ideas and are now asking for a limitation on what is allowed to be said.
The FCC was the first step for the transformation of freedom of speech to freedom to listen. Where the government decided what was acceptable and unacceptable speech on the airwaves. The internet has allowed for an actual resumption of freedom of speech but there are still those forces that want it to be freedom to listen to what has been deemed acceptable. Make no mistake this is the same thing. They want to decide for you what is acceptable and squash everything else.