If you are just looking to massage the numbers so there are more first homes vs second homes percentage-wise without creating new first homes, then taxing luxury second homes may work. It has great potential to change the numbers on a spreadsheet.
Decreasing the number of secondary homes for the wealthy _does not_ create more first homes people can realistically afford though.
This guy fails to communicate properly how others can and should contribute to his project. I see this all the time where the standards of a project aren't properly documented so the reviewer/maintainer just wastes time reviewing the same thing thousands of times until they give up.
This is likely the best answer so far. It would be the same as if they had subcontracted some software factory where many junior devs produced and shipped low quality code that “works”.
The writer of the article confesses to using LLMs to improve their grammar. Writer is then upset Grammarly correctly attributes the recommendation he is getting to someone they know.
A nothing burger essentially.
As if shaming people for using ChatGPT to write articles will have any meaningful effect.
It's also quite fatiguing having to read the same complaint over and over when the solution is so simple yet many fail to grasp it.
> Do you wanna change social media? Try and find and effective way to bring them down.
You don't change social media by building yet another closed protocol. You'd be building more of the same. The only option left is to build open protocols, and nostr is another attempt.
Checkmate.
For identities to be truly decentralized, there's no one you could run to to ask permission to change your password. Either you own your identity, or someone else does.
Your identity, BinaryIgor only exists in ycombinator, and for as long as ycombinator allows it, and only ycombinator can allow you to change your password. I can't recall how accounts are created here, but likely it also depends on linking it to your email identity as well. If ycombinator disappears, your identity goes down with it.
Decreasing the number of secondary homes for the wealthy _does not_ create more first homes people can realistically afford though.