HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

Medowar

no profile record

comments

Medowar
·18 ngày trước·discuss
The efficiency is a thing of the past, an mainly when dealing with manufacturing, which we were really good at.

The world got faster, but german industries and politics never got the memo.
Medowar
·2 tháng trước·discuss
What you see here is decentralisation working. The issue is with the operator of the de TLD, and as such only that TLD is affected. DNS is not decentralised in such a way, that multiple organisations run the infrastructure of a TLD, those are always run by a single entity.(.com and .net are operated by Verisign)

So what the issue is, that the operator has, does not change the impact.
Medowar
·3 tháng trước·discuss
That is a bit of a unfair comparison. The Hetzner and DO instances are shared hosting, you are using dedicated ressources.

Using a Netcup VPS 1000 G12 is more comparable.

read: IOPS=18.7k, BW=73.1MiB/s

write: IOPS=8053, BW=31.5MiB/s

Latency Read avg: 5.39 ms, P99.9: 85.4 ms, max 482.6 ms

Write avg: 3.36 ms, P99.9: 86.5 ms, max 488.7 ms
Medowar
·4 tháng trước·discuss
all Team and Enterprise accounts still on legacy request-based pricing
Medowar
·4 tháng trước·discuss
> We also ran the full dataset of 263 URLs (254 phishing, 9 confirmed legitimate) through Muninn's automatic scan. This is the scan that runs on every page you visit without any action on your part. On its own, the automatic scan correctly identified 238 of the 254 phishing sites and only incorrectly flagged 6 legitimate pages. [...] The tradeoff is that it flagged all 9 of the legitimate sites in our dataset as suspicious, ...

Am I missing something or is that a 66%/100% False Positive Rate on legitimate Sites?

If GSB would have that ratio, it would be absolute unusable.. So comparing these two is absolutely wrong...