HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

Nezteb

no profile record

Submissions

Another GitHub outage in the same day

githubstatus.com
375 points·by Nezteb·5 tháng trước·283 comments

The von Neumann bottleneck is impeding AI computing?

research.ibm.com
61 points·by Nezteb·10 tháng trước·32 comments

comments

Nezteb
·5 tháng trước·discuss
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bad_apples

Immoral boot-licking human engineers are indistinguishable from LLMs.
Nezteb
·5 tháng trước·discuss
> it's also accelerating digital UBI

Do you have sources for this claim?
Nezteb
·6 tháng trước·discuss
> So Wikipedia is corrupt as per usual. Grokipedia's article is significantly less biased and more accurate.

I hope this was sarcasm.
Nezteb
·10 tháng trước·discuss
I thought so too, although treating everything as data and functions is really nice [1].

Regarding the BEAM and why Gleam has a separate library for actors: [2]

> "One notable difference between Elixir and Gleam is that Elixir gets to just re-use the OTP code as-is (with some Elixir wrappers on top for convenience). Gleam concluded that the OTP is built expecting dynamic types, and that for best results in Gleam they'd need to re-implement the key primitives. That's why the example shown is an "Actor" not a GenServer - it serves the same purpose, and might even fit in a Supervision tree, but isn't actually a GenServer."

There's a brief snippet mentioning this in the Gleam OTP readme as well: [3]

> "Actors do not yet support all OTP system messages, so some of the OTP debugging APIs may not be fully functional."

[1] https://mckayla.blog/posts/all-you-need-is-data-and-function...

[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40645489

[3] https://github.com/gleam-lang/otp#limitations-and-known-issu...
Nezteb
·3 năm trước·discuss
The only suggestion I've seen that would make some sense is Section 174: https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/the-pulse-75