i don't understand the use case for 1x2.5gbs + 1x1gbs for a router. Why not both 2.5gbs it's not like you'll be running lots of stuff on the router itself so it would be more useful to have a wan AND a lan at 2.5 (outside of load balancing for a lot of wifi devices of course)
Thanks. People are really acting like we were cavemen before kubernetes, but I guess that those people just never tried to run anything without k8s and because that's the only thing they know they are biased toward it
I do use gotify [1] which seems to be pretty much the same, and does the job quite well. Not sure how they compare, does ntfy goes through Google / Apple network or it's directly connected to your server instance?
It can be done with proton, or at least it used to be possible (Not sure, didn't check in a while) thanks to their bridge. A small local software you'd run that decrypt everything and provides a local imap server with the decrypted content
Ok I get what you're saying now, that's fair. Tbh I mainly do Symfony so most of what dev-dependencies use are already in the dependencies for me so it never happened
What the heck is going on in the commits though, the messages are useless ("Update frontend (1 files)") and there's tons of "Initial commit — CryptIRC v0.3.0" commits.
The index.html is insane. 12.5k lines long, everything embedded in it
Well, no ? That's litterally saying "trust the synthetic process, we don't care about real world usage" ?? I don't care if it works better theorically, if it feels bad in everyday usage it IS bad
Docker already fills up my dev machines yet they decided for this insane solution:
> The containerd image store uses more disk space than the legacy storage drivers for the same images. This is because containerd stores images in both compressed and uncompressed formats, while the legacy drivers stored only the uncompressed layers.