HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

Rerarom

no profile record

Submissions

Steve Jobs: The Next Insanely Great Thing (1996)

wired.com
1 points·by Rerarom·4 năm trước·0 comments

How full does a bottle have to be in order to be the most stable?

quora.com
1 points·by Rerarom·4 năm trước·0 comments

I would like a job writing Haskell

blog.plover.com
405 points·by Rerarom·4 năm trước·492 comments

Jumping into Web3

ribbonfarm.com
2 points·by Rerarom·5 năm trước·0 comments

Sheaves in Minecraft

quoteme.github.io
69 points·by Rerarom·5 năm trước·9 comments

Some Were Meant for C (2017) [pdf]

humprog.org
20 points·by Rerarom·5 năm trước·8 comments

America's Occultist: An Interview with Lon Milo DuQuette (2010)

patheos.com
1 points·by Rerarom·5 năm trước·0 comments

comments

Rerarom
·4 năm trước·discuss
Yeah, I somehow missed looking at the username.
Rerarom
·4 năm trước·discuss
This is the second comment that mentions an iPhone - what's the catch?
Rerarom
·4 năm trước·discuss
no, the OP says it in a different sense, namely that even if you are duly impressed by these advancements, they will stop in a few years and a new line of research will be needed
Rerarom
·4 năm trước·discuss
Yeah, that's the issue, the autospotter is not perfect. Maybe someone from HN could enlighten us.
Rerarom
·4 năm trước·discuss
The new physics is not in the 4.7 but that in that the model's third and fourth variables seem to be new, compared to the known models.
Rerarom
·4 năm trước·discuss
This quote came to mind when seeing the title but I could not remember the source (read it in high-school, I think before learning formally about derivatives). I'm glad someone found it.
Rerarom
·4 năm trước·discuss
That collection of posts/comments is highly misleading.

Better just to search for the subject on reddit.
Rerarom
·4 năm trước·discuss
I would never even consider buying an Apple product due to the price.
Rerarom
·4 năm trước·discuss
Obligatory link to ACX review: https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/book-review-sadly-porn
Rerarom
·4 năm trước·discuss
I don't get a rickroll, I get a redirect to the address you posted.
Rerarom
·4 năm trước·discuss
They also did that with Scholze in 2018.
Rerarom
·4 năm trước·discuss
She is, I expected her to win in 2018.
Rerarom
·4 năm trước·discuss
Don't we all have tons of pictures of ourselves online already?
Rerarom
·4 năm trước·discuss
Yeah 22 years ago as a young kid I was obsessed with reading the SOFTWARE catalog of my local computer store (the hardware stuff was all video cards that all looked like each other, the software was exciting stuff like space simulators! 3D graphics! video editing!).

And this was after the days of

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Home

were quite over.
Rerarom
·4 năm trước·discuss
Wow! I never thought there were records of that.
Rerarom
·4 năm trước·discuss
One option is to go into academia, they don't care about private sector experience.
Rerarom
·4 năm trước·discuss
Because until we get mind uploading, there aren't enough smart people to cover everything (e.g. even though Tao knows way more math than the average mathematician, I have solved interesting math problems that are simply not in his or in any other genius's immediate interests).
Rerarom
·4 năm trước·discuss
Yeah, it's a very strong result.

On the other hand, for a say fourth degree equation, it just says that some solution expressible in terms of higher roots exists, but not how to find it. To find the expression, one needs to study the "generic" equation.
Rerarom
·4 năm trước·discuss
What are some good alternatives to Duolingo with fewer dark patterns? (And don't suggest traditional methods, I am very much not against them, I am just curious about apps and such.)
Rerarom
·4 năm trước·discuss
Here it is

http://web.archive.org/web/20190425125010/https://medium.com...