Housing affordability is such a silly subject. We live in both a democracy and a capitalist economy, both in the US and Canada. Most believe those within some locality should have a say over that area. If they do not want more housing because it financially benefits them to enforce scarcity, why should they not be able to?
We accept the limited availability of other luxury items, why is housing in a _specific_ locality any different?
If housing affordability is a problem, live somewhere else.
We accept the limited availability of other luxury items, why is housing in a _specific_ locality any different?
If housing affordability is a problem, live somewhere else.