TheoGone·11 tháng trước·discussPart of it is the top LLM companies (OpenAI, Mistral) all copy and over train, often against e.g. Claude's or DeepSeek's TOS, on each other's models.
TheoGone·11 tháng trước·discussPart of it is they all copy and over train, often against the TOS, on each other's models.
TheoGone·11 tháng trước·discussLLMs are good at mimicking human intuition. Still sucks at deep thinking.LLMs PATTERN MATCH well. Good at "fast" System 1 thinking, instantly generating intuitive, fluent responses.LLMs are good at mimicking logic, not real reasoning. Simulate "slow," deliberate System 2 thinking when prompted to work step-by-step.The core of an LLM is not understanding but just predicting the next most word in a sequence.LLMs are good at both associative brainstorming (System 1) and creating works within a defined structure, like a poem (System 2).Reasoning is the Achilles heel rn. AN LLM's logic can SEEM plausible, it's based on CORRELATION, NOT deductive reasoning.