> Is it unfair for you to create content/products/etc after you have read and learned from various sources on the internet, potentially depriving them of clicks/income?
Because it's false equivalence? ChatGPT isn't a human being. It's a product that is built upon data from other sources.
This is a reminder to always figure out the game in an organization and play that game. Don't blindly assume that if you do a good job, you will be safe. You might not like politics, but politics is, unfortunately, a natural part of any organization.
The unfortunately thing is that most large companies are bad at retaining people. The quickest way to increase your compensation is to change jobs every 3-4 years. I think in 2022, it's much less taboo to move between companies.
I think social media tech companies are going to on a long term downward trend. People are sick do adtech and surveillance capitalism. But everything else in tech will bounce back.
This rings so true for Elon Musk fanboys. I also like the full quote, "Small minds talk about people. Average minds talk about events. Great minds talk about ideas."
I mean I wonder why? Tech companies foster this type of work environment and now they complain people don’t have loyalty? Come on, you can’t have it both ways.
I think for baby boomers, they are used to getting their news from 1-2 sources only. So they believe anything the tv station or newspaper tells them. For our generation, we are much more critical about the news we are getting and know how the internet can be manipulated. So having grown up with the internet, we tend to have more antibodies.
Because it's false equivalence? ChatGPT isn't a human being. It's a product that is built upon data from other sources.
The question is if this data is legal to scrape, which it is: Web scraping is legal, US appeals court reaffirms [https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31075396].
As long as the content is not copyrighted and it's not regurgitating the exact same content, then it should be okay.