and at a time nobody even did care for aerodynamics of a cars underbelly [its ventro-basal anatomy, so to speak] Chapman aimed to optimize on a level known only from constructing air-planes. shark-skin'ish foils, if not mistaken, they too were among the first testing on racing cars
but the commenting serves it purpose, one does hope
even more so does what some assume to be 'voting' [like/dislike]
not sure how to measure tho how many shooting massacres it prevents.
former mentor of our at Lond Inst of Psychiatry certainly would have designed a field study of it, if he'd been introduced to the nets, social nets in particular
>the visual pathway does some math to reinterpret RGB as a closed circle of hues we see in our visual field<
sort of, computation of 'contrast' so to speak, or, in broad terms, differences in wavelengths
most likely done, foremost and in essence, in area V4, cortically. if damaged, cerebral achromatopsia [colour blindness results]. patients won't even see/perceive induced 'coloured' visual phenomena, such as phosphenes [Farady made a few quid by electro-shocking ppl, for instance in Jardin des Tuileries, Paris : electro-magnetc impulses applied transcranially to the occipital part of the brain can elicit, in some subjects, brief bright colourfull light sensations]
u must have missed reading this : ".. Microsoft or Google: both seem responsive and eager to fix within 90 days (mostly) .."
but then u not need to read it. and who would given all the exquisite experiences with M$ and/or Goo compared to nightmares Apple delivers to u, overpriced, ofc
in a sense it is good reading tho after all in that it indicates that exactly those are not the one's one does meet in Apple-communities
quite right
and this is HN. and one may well wonder in how far FB does NOT seriously interfer with discussions here [and elsewhere, ofc too, for that matter]
and that 'kill' fo 'the competition' in essence is what it's all about. no matter what's obvious or not, seems likely or not -- given FB's history, Zuckerboi's history ..
recalled that too.
so far for Zuckerboi not known to 'be evil' when it comes to competition and/or what one may think of in context of so-called 'opponent research'.
and, seemingly not beeing 'known-for' doesn't necessarily mean seriously not-involved and not-guilty. Epstein, Prince Andrew and the Weinstein creep too were not known -- however, turned out, eventually, there were and there are some who knew and appear to know ..
right. very likely they wouldn't be even capable to instruct their faked 60 mill ai-managed profiles 'to like' Zuckerboi's own sentence for that matter ..
quite.
it became something the great LandArtist's [LandArt 1.0] probably not imagined possible -- Holt, Smithson, de Maria, Heizer, Turell, etc
and nothing is left behind.
right. it does.
besides, Google paid since initial release of Safari when Cupertino had decided what the final design/functions of Safari were going to be -- seems many forgot about that as well as where and when Goo blunt and boldly went headhunting for new staff and peeps in p2p underground in the days Carracho was about to become -- very briefly -- a much fancied p2p-client
it's okay as it is -- IF, and only IF, the artist says so !
Rauschenberg too, as well as Lichtenstein and many others, wouldn't have liked it a bit being turned into some hotair egomaniac 0-creative wraped in plastic in some fin-groupies Schnabel'oesque or Koons'ian gallery spot