awssucs · HackerTrans

6 năm trướcdiscuss

I believe your blind passion for the eu - a project i support - makes you blind to its flaws. Some of us in the eu are struggling with its incompetence and any criticism is quickly shut down as euro skepticism or misinformation. A dangerous path if we want the project to survive.

awssucs

6 năm trướcdiscuss

[flagged]

awssucs

6 năm trướcdiscuss

Humour is usually understood by clever people, not wannabe contrarians who mimic each other and pretend to know it all. HN is but a shell of what it used to be, infested by pretentious mediocrity. Read carefully and you will see how language, topics and “well informed” explanations are following a set of pattern. Basically most people here imitate each other and rarely provide meaningful insights while down voters often downvote meaningful replies. Links are great tho.

Just have a read and see how many replies on most topics rarely dive into specifics and often barely scratch the surface of topics. Humous takes a deep understanding of a topic for one to see why it is hilariously amusing to some. Not something you can achieve with shallowness.

awssucs

6 năm trướcdiscuss

Oh really. A close look from someone experienced on most topics will reveal the opposite. Tech discussions at least are pretty shallow or mis informed and usually limited to a few recycled topics. Easy to appear clever in front of impressionable fresh graduates but most experts will immediately see through most comments. But hey whatever suits the echo chamber.

awssucs

6 năm trướcdiscuss

The EU appears to he clueless, as usual. I am surprised it’s not imposing sanctions on the UK as it does with most countries going against its will.

awssucs

6 năm trướcdiscuss

astra zeneca is 90% effective as there are two doses needed, much like pfizers

awssucs

6 năm trướcdiscuss

nah this is not reddit the quality here is lower

awssucs

6 năm trướcdiscuss

I agree nobody knew what the cloud was becoming. But it feels like aws is selling an unfinished product and people are wasting money and time working around non issues. Aws is great for medium sized projects but as soon as your project grows, you bump into silly issues like this one. Given that s3 is more or less a file storage you don’t really expect issues such as “weak” consistency. You expect a file to be committed once written (yes aws can do queueing behind the scenes) but when it returns a 200 ok it means the file was stored. Otherwise the good folks at aws should return a 202 accepted response as all properly designed apis do and let the user know that a delay in reading is expected.

awssucs

6 năm trướcdiscuss

yes for aws it was an issue, what i meant is that aws solved an issue that it itself created.

awssucs

6 năm trướcdiscuss

mmyeah never had this issue on non aws distributed storage. luckily for aws there are plenty of inexperienced devs who think this is a real issue in a properly designed large storage system.

awssucs

6 năm trướcdiscuss

“After a successful write of a new object or an overwrite of an existing object, any subsequent read request immediately receives the latest version of the object.” - being able to issue a read after a write has been the case in any system ever.

AWS solving a fabricated issue, and the crowd cheering it as progress. Have to love herd mentality.