Definitely a bit of extra work but can be minimal if event tracking is centralized in one area of the code.
But yeah, not saying I recommend you do it, just saying it’s possible and not something that should be seen as a waste of time, especially if you truly believe in creating privacy focused software.
I’m not sure I understand why they need to do everything twice. But regarding your comment about most market segments not caring about privacy, I agree especially when it comes to B2C products.
Users will complain about it but it will rarely be a deal breaker. Will only matter if the product being offered holds really sensitive info
Either way if a company or Dev wants to respect privacy, that’s great and I applaud it. A product doesn’t need to collect every single piece of data on all their users to figure out their strategy...unless your product’s monetization strategy is all about selling user data
Offer the option to opt in. I prefer apps that ask you upfront if they can collect stats and analytics. I’d imagine a decent percentage of users will opt in giving you enough data for customer and product improvement.
Also avoid sharing too much information about your users if using a third party provider for analytics. It shouldn’t be more than an user ID
Any software engineering job. You’ve probably gained a lot of experience at the startup as well as being a technical cofounder. You’d be surprised how many engineers out there who are great at algorithms have zero skills or experience building actual products. Find a company that doesn’t rely on algos as their measurement tool. Quite a few exist
If you are looking for a change from coding, product management or data science are relevant career paths where you can leverage your previous experience
I’d say it depends on the data being persisted. PII or any user data that is private in nature are good candidates for encryption regardless of session length. Other than that encryption is overkill.
Regarding keeping updated, I find small hobby projects to be a good outlet to try new technologies, architectures or processes. Often times I’d end up translating those to valuable additions to the code base at my day job.
As for being stuck in a position where learning opportunities are limited, try pushing for taking on tasks on other teams that are working on technologies you are interested in learning. If the company you are in frowns upon this sort of work then sounds like you should find a more open environment. They are companies out there that value this sort of curiosity.
“But other apps are fairly easy to get people to pay for where privacy could be a key differentiator”
Yeah apps that collect super personal information (i.e security solutions, baby monitors) I can imagine privacy being key. But what about everyday apps like fitness trackers, journals, habit trackers and personal finance? From what I gather people complain about privacy of those apps but would rather go a manual route instead of paying for a private version of it.
Makes sense for B2B services where data collection is the core product (i.e analysis, crash reporting). I can see businesses wanting to pay for a service that wouldn’t take their metrics and sell it. But what about B2C?
Definitely a bit of extra work but can be minimal if event tracking is centralized in one area of the code.
But yeah, not saying I recommend you do it, just saying it’s possible and not something that should be seen as a waste of time, especially if you truly believe in creating privacy focused software.