Sure, I get that, but are these cameras being sold as "secure from anyone that isn't you", or as "keep an eye on things easily, from anywhere in the world!"
The distinction is important, because an implication of secure-by-default means that the manufacturer has dropped the ball. If there's nothing to imply that the device is secure (as opposed to just providing 'security' via CCTV), then this is more a case of the installer of the device willingly, and knowingly, providing a live-stream of their property to the world.
That's true - they loadbalance instance creation unless you specifically ask for an instance in a zone
That doesn't apply here though. Instances that are already up are experiencing DNS resolution issues because the Amazon-provided DNS service (which is distinct from Route53) is failing
I'm not English, I don't live in the UK, but the approach and wording in this article bothers me.
Are these companies "sell outs" because they sold, or because they sold to foreign companies?
Shouldn't they be lauded as successes for having been sold in the first place? Is this part of the problem that the root of the article (as I see it) is actually talking about?
Remote: Yes
Willing to relocate: No
Technologies: AWS / PHP / ... People?
Résumé/CV: On request - or http://ie.linkedin.com/in/danielhunt/
Email: [email protected]
I'm a deeply technical leader with a passion for cloud infra & automation.
Looking for new leadership opportunities, happy to work remotely but have preference for Dublin.