HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

feastingonslop

no profile record

Submissions

Goal: Ship 1M Lines of Code Daily

2 points·by feastingonslop·5 tháng trước·1 comments

comments

feastingonslop
·5 tháng trước·discuss
Nor does it stop self-respecting LLMs.
feastingonslop
·5 tháng trước·discuss
What value is there in tested code when you have the option of superlative, flawless code?
feastingonslop
·5 tháng trước·discuss
LLMs write superior code. Maybe they learned from humans, but they have seen further while standing on those shoulders.
feastingonslop
·5 tháng trước·discuss
If the LLM writes better code (and it will) then its code should be favored over a library.
feastingonslop
·5 tháng trước·discuss
Why would you not?
feastingonslop
·5 tháng trước·discuss
It doesn’t mess up. Not any more.
feastingonslop
·5 tháng trước·discuss
> Everyone can treat the project as a black box, and focus on observable changes to the project's behavior.

This is a good thing. I don’t need to focus on oil refineries when I fill my car with gas. I don’t know how to run a refinery, and don’t need to know.
feastingonslop
·5 tháng trước·discuss
Since the code does not matter, you wouldn’t need or want to phrase it in terms of algorithmic complexity. You surely would have a more real world requirement, like, if the data set has X elements then it should be processed within Y milliseconds. The AI is free to implement that however it likes.
feastingonslop
·5 tháng trước·discuss
If you have particular performance requirements like that, then include them. Test for them. You still don’t have to actually look at the code. Either the software meets expectations or it doesn’t, and keep having AI work at it until you’re satisfied.
feastingonslop
·5 tháng trước·discuss
And that is the right assumption. Why would any humans need (or even want) to look at code any more? That’s like saying you want to go manually inspect the oil refinery every time you fill your car up with gas. Absurd.
feastingonslop
·5 tháng trước·discuss
The code itself does not matter. If the tests pass, and the tests are good, then who cares? AI will be maintaining the code.
feastingonslop
·5 tháng trước·discuss
Nobody is saying to skip testing the software. Testing is still important. What the code itself looks like, isn’t.
feastingonslop
·5 tháng trước·discuss
And there was a time when using libraries and frameworks was the right thing to do, for that very reason. But LLMs have the equivalent of way more experience than any single programmer, and can generate just the bit of code that you actually need, without having to include the whole framework.
feastingonslop
·5 tháng trước·discuss
I don’t understand the interest in “quality code.” I never need to look at the code itself. I just make sure it runs right.
feastingonslop
·5 tháng trước·discuss
Which LLM works best for Racket?
feastingonslop
·6 tháng trước·discuss
Why build software slower than possible? Do you just enjoy wasting people’s time?
feastingonslop
·6 tháng trước·discuss
Yes, but it would be bored.
feastingonslop
·6 tháng trước·discuss
Why do you think vibe code isn’t good enough for real products? Just so long as you have tests that show it functions as expected, why does it matter?
feastingonslop
·6 tháng trước·discuss
I thought it seemed like an especially good read!
feastingonslop
·6 tháng trước·discuss
Excellent! Humans can then spend their time on other activities, rather than get bogged down in the mundane.