The perfect example for how bloated, inefficient, and wasteful the bureaucracies of higher education can become.
How did $40m of fraudulent spending go unchecked for literally years? It seems to be that even at the largest private sector organizations this kind of malfeasance would have been caught much sooner.
Well, at companies that actually care about 100% rollout of "corporate, invasive crapware" on computers that _they own_ and that are used to process _company data_ and access _company resources_, the alternative is usually just to ban Linux workstations altogether.
I see this as a strict improvement for adoption of Linux workstations in the corporate world
Your comment is technically correct, but misleading.
In fact California specifically does not tax ex-residents for income arising from the disposition of stock acquired with ISOs, which is usually the way pre-IPO employees acquire shares. This is true even if the ISOs were granted for work performed in California.
Bad, in my view. (Although I am not a lawyer, and would definitely appreciate input from one here!)
Hardware offload of a network protocol is an extremely generic concept and this patent seems to describe that concept (without any kind of novel mechanism or implementation details).
And emerging QUIC acceleration technology is likely to be stifled by intellectual property laws.
Intel has already filed (in 2019) for a European patent that seems to claim inventorship of the generic concept of hardware offloading (as it applies to QUIC)
Wow, an ATO exploit that only received a $6,500 bounty? This signals to grey-/black-hat researchers that their research efforts or Slack bug disclosures are best directed elsewhere..
There's a subtle difference between AGPL and the Commons Clause licenses.
AGPL requires network-accessible code to be disclosed & licensed under an AGPL-compatible license.
The Commons Clause license outright prohibits SaaS-style offerings of the licensed code.
A lot of startups licensing their code under AGPL might still have AWS et al. eat their lunch, becuase all Amazon needs to do to remain compliant is to publish any modifications made to the AGPL-ed code.
How did $40m of fraudulent spending go unchecked for literally years? It seems to be that even at the largest private sector organizations this kind of malfeasance would have been caught much sooner.