> a hostile foreign government who has already hacked American elections once and is planning to do it again
What do you mean by hacked? There is no evidence that any vote counts were changed. So I don't think the election was hacked. The only evidence of any hacking was the theft of DNC emails, but even then the DNC has never turned over the servers they say were hacked to the FBI. And Crowdstrike retracted key parts of their report on the supposed hacking.
Certainly I think the Russian government would love to control the outcome of American elections, and they probably try daily to do that. But saying that they or anyone else hacked American elections is a stretch.
I'm not saying this with any political motivation. I'm just trying to interpret the facts of what happened in 2016.
You're not allowed to cross the border illegally. This list of "journalists" is actually a list of people who were/are trying to help people enter the country illegally.
"Suppress normal democratic dissent" and "fascism" sounds like a conspiracy theory.
What do you mean by hacked? There is no evidence that any vote counts were changed. So I don't think the election was hacked. The only evidence of any hacking was the theft of DNC emails, but even then the DNC has never turned over the servers they say were hacked to the FBI. And Crowdstrike retracted key parts of their report on the supposed hacking.
Certainly I think the Russian government would love to control the outcome of American elections, and they probably try daily to do that. But saying that they or anyone else hacked American elections is a stretch.
I'm not saying this with any political motivation. I'm just trying to interpret the facts of what happened in 2016.