I mean.. they did loan the money, with all the associated responsibilities and risks of loaning money. And they did do the work. All the agreements were entered voluntarily, so what's the fault here?
The best option.. for what? To live in? To invest in? To look at? Besides, isn't it incredibly personal? What's the best option for someone, might be a poor option for someone else.
I did not think that the point of the article is to complain about award withholding from Asian students.. although the attribution of race seems misplaced.
I thought the point was about the loss of meritocracy and the redefinition of what it means to fail. And grading work on a 50-100 scale.. you really don't think that's weird?
This is a possible outcome. However, another possibility is that not all children are of the same aptitude, and therefore your experience might not be representative of their.
Lots of talk about reform and transformation but light in detail on what the desired changes are. Triple down on One China policy, but multiple mentions of special status of HK/Macau. Anyone got any additional insight?
The back of my fridge is more interesting than this comment. Why am I replying to this comment then, rather than looking at the back of my fridge? Hmm...
Then keep on doing what you are doing. You are the one who started this discussion on buying land and building houses. We were talking about Switzerland.