Already 8 years and being non profitable is forgivable for a hardware startup creating something new, especially a new silicon.
Depends why they are losing money. But losing money alone is not bad. This ain't an ice cream truck.
Agree groq implodes if demand for intellegent automation tanks (i.e. bubble burst), or competitors disrupt the disruptor. Another Z is all you need paper means my old laptop is running models fast or something means groq is not something you need.
They can probably pivot.
BTW OpenAI is 9 years old and they are a SaaS/PaaS running on Azure.
Friendly would be win win. We'll pay you so you dont worry about money, and we win because you are great. Batna (looks better as a word) is there but in the distance.
Yeah. Nah that makes you sound silly (at least for software jobs) unless there is a good reason for it, like currency conversions or peverse tax incentives.
There is a tiny chance that asking for 133700 might get a smile at a smaller tech focused company though.
Why is fertility declining? I posit we are hitting non-food constraints. Political ones. Land use constraints. If you build millions of homes fertility will go up.
Bitcoin is a pure exanple thay shows the limit to energy consumption is how much money people have to throw at it. And if that money is thrown into generating more energy it is a cycle. There is no stomach size and human reproduction constraints. We can waste power as quickly as we can generate more.
A gravitational wave requires an event like a black hole merger, or basicially somerhing to move and change the field, right?
In this case, how does the fact that a big object is still influencing space/time around it communicate that fact when it is not moving. Is that still gravitrons?
Google can't please all of the sites all of the time, or all the visitors.
It is too big to evem worry about that 4k a day clicks for one site. It is like us optimizing the expense of 0.01c. It makes a difference when that 0.01c is an API call that you call a million times. But it only surfaces if you do aggregate it.
Therefore this problem can only even be seem by Google if it can be surfaced in aggregate overy say a billion queries.
I wonder how that can be done.
Probably only can be done using data. Which means spying on people in various ways. And making assumptions about length of time on site equals quality.
They probably use machine learning too. There may be no reason for the lost rankings other than a wind change caused by some updated parameters in an OKR chasing model.
Depends why they are losing money. But losing money alone is not bad. This ain't an ice cream truck.
Agree groq implodes if demand for intellegent automation tanks (i.e. bubble burst), or competitors disrupt the disruptor. Another Z is all you need paper means my old laptop is running models fast or something means groq is not something you need.
They can probably pivot.
BTW OpenAI is 9 years old and they are a SaaS/PaaS running on Azure.