HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

hughrlomas

no profile record

comments

hughrlomas
·2 năm trước·discuss
FDA link: https://www.fda.gov/food/nutrition-food-labeling-and-critica...
hughrlomas
·2 năm trước·discuss
It is worth investing a little more on nuclear in the interest of energy security. It isn't always a race to the bottom.

A diverse and robust energy grid is composed of various generation sources that differ in capacity factors, environmental impact, stability, availability, etc.
hughrlomas
·2 năm trước·discuss
The official openai-cookbook (https://github.com/openai/openai-cookbook) used to have an explicit, but buried, call out that instruction-following models like `text-davinci-003` were "Less diverse; less creative; sometimes harder to steer tone, style, etc." as opposed to base completion models like `davinci`.

It stood out to me because it seemed to be an internal admission that this training narrowed the potential of the models.

Required a bit of digging but I found the old file in the history, the relevant text is in the comparison table at the bottom: https://github.com/openai/openai-cookbook/blob/c651bfdda64ac...
hughrlomas
·2 năm trước·discuss
The referenced paper (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009286742...) specifically states that it continues after the solution is changed to plain water.

> Two-headed worms made this way reveal a permanent revision of the target morphology: subsequent rounds of regeneration in plain water, long after the reagent is gone from the tissue, continue to make two-headed worms.
hughrlomas
·2 năm trước·discuss
Great work. It would be nice to see the interactions wrap to make a more seamless experience. The particles themselves do seem to wrap around the edges, but the forces do not.
hughrlomas
·3 năm trước·discuss
Try asking

"What is the first sentence of Moby Dick?"

And then

"What is the second sentence of Moby Dick?"

And see what happens.
hughrlomas
·6 năm trước·discuss
I'm tired of this false statement being peddled.

The FBI, CIA, and republican-led Senate Committee on Intelligence have all produced extensive volumes of documentation of Russian interference in the 2016 election.

If you're referring specifically to accusations of collusion between Trump and Russia, the core accusation was that he and his administration were playing the role of the useful idiot, being plied and influenced by Russia to the detriment of American interests.

The idea that he was intentionally working with Russia in a direct manner may has always been a misleading straw man.