Not to mention when the White House published Obama's birth certificate as a PDF. I remember being able to open it and turn the different layers off and on.
And also, some people could suffer real damages. Imagine if someone is lying to their wife about what they do on the weekend or about who they've gone to a conference with. Or imagine if someone has found themselves with dangerous enemies who discover where they go, what they do and with whom.
At the moment, these things are not the problem of the person taking the video
I think an inherent problem is that donors need to be continuously buying the tokens that developers are selling or the project goes to zero. So the the protocol should be built for the donors.
They could say "People can contribute to a project by just staking tokens against a project" but staking tokens isn't a stream of new money. New money needs to be coming from somewhere.
Tokens can be created out of thin air, but money can't be.
It doesn't look good to me through a "game theory lens".
Had an interview once over Zoom. Dude has me do a coding test: normal String manipulation algorithmic problem solving stuff. So I’m screen sharing and try to google something and he’s like “STOP! What are you doing?” I’m like “well I don’t remember the exact name of the function” and he’s like “You can’t do that, this is a Test!!”
So I flunked his “test” and then immediately contacted the recruiter and said “no thanks” before he could muahahaha