[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractal_dimension
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coastline_paradox > there are billions of souls on this planet. They're not a rare thing
> like say, gold. They're very easily produced, by two people getting it
> on. That leads to a harsh conclusion: human beings aren't that valuable
> as individuals. We are in fact very disposable and replaceable.
I appreciate the perspective you're offering here, and I don't entirely disagree, especially from an economic angle. But I do want to offer a counterpoint: [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47248319
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rutaceae
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citrus
[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zanthoxylum
Also, this is a pretty good page on citrus (both family and genus): https://www.clovegarden.com/ingred/citrus.html MetaPost is written in literate programming language WEB, then generating
Pascal code from it. Hence the tooling and developer experience around
it is quite suboptimal. Extending it is also almost impossible.
It's unfortunate (and a little funny to me) that a literate programming language, the whole purpose of which is to remain highly maintainable for future generations, is a stumbling block to development. Maybe we need literate build systems, so people can even begin to do development in the language proper? Or maybe the whole "literate" concept harkens from an increasingly-bygone era where it was assumed that a maintainer would spend a long time getting to know the existing system in detail, basically reading a book's-worth of material on the subject as they do their work. Being able to abandon a project for months or years and then come back
to it is really important to me (that’s how all my projects work!) ...
It's perhaps especially true for a hobbyist situation, but even in a bigger environment, there is a cost to keeping people on hand who understand how XYZ works, getting new people up to speed, etc.
Interestingly, at Reed, there is a low emphasis (or even anti-emphasis) on grades — a student has to go out of their way to obtain them. Instead, emphasis is on written feedback and discussion, to understand one's performance on assignments.
All this to say: de-emphasizing grades in school is not necessarily a bad thing, and does not necessarily harm the reputation of the university. It can be a sign of good priorities (eg: learning, rather than numbers-gaming).
[1] https://www.gradeinflation.com/Reed.html