HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

jahsome

no profile record

comments

jahsome
·5 tháng trước·discuss
There was absolutely nothing backhanded about anything I said. I regret if it came across that way.

I wish you'd have elaborated on specifics and actually tried to understand, rather than telling me what I believe. I can see now you just want to be angry at someone, and I'm no longer interested in engaging with you. In any case, I'm genuinely sorry for whatever I've done to activate you, and I wish you well.
jahsome
·5 tháng trước·discuss
> Pretending that we are in full blown dictatorship is, in my view, still cynical.

Could you please point to what I said that implies I'm pretending a "full blown dictatorship?" I apologize if that's somehow what I indicated. It certainly wasn't my intent.
jahsome
·5 tháng trước·discuss
Can you explain how openly admiring someone's idealism is of "low quality"?
jahsome
·5 tháng trước·discuss
I envy the worldview it's possible someone can take money from another and still maintain independence.

What's up with the straw men?
jahsome
·5 tháng trước·discuss
I was being sincere, my friend. I genuinely envy that worldview. I long for it. I wish above nearly all else I could reset. I was being authentic and vulnerable. Why does that infuriate you?

Read your statement again and tell me who the pessimist is, and who is most in need of a break from the internet.
jahsome
·5 tháng trước·discuss
[flagged]
jahsome
·5 tháng trước·discuss
Fair enough, perhaps I could have said "normal is relative"

A behavior may be typical, or common maybe, but I think "normal" evokes certain connotations when describing human behavior.
jahsome
·5 tháng trước·discuss
You can childishly call me all the names you'd like, but you're distinctly wrong. Words have literal meanings whether you accept that fact or not.

The operative word you have repeatedly used is interpretation. Anything that requires interpretation is inherently and literally NOT obvious.
jahsome
·5 tháng trước·discuss
I guess it's time for a series rewatch!

*for anyone out of the loop this is a reference to Arrested Development -- incredible show!
jahsome
·5 tháng trước·discuss
I didn't say you are nuts, I said your statement is. The distinction should be "obvious" no?

Here's a hint though: normal is a myth.
jahsome
·5 tháng trước·discuss
"It's just a banana hackers, how much could it cost?! $5?"

Though that joke is in desperate need of an inflationary update.
jahsome
·5 tháng trước·discuss
It's not that "nuts" to take the literal meaning of people's own words. Calling it "obvious" someone meant something rather than what they actually typed with their own fingers is pretty nuts though. It might be common for folks to misspeak (mistype), but that by no stretch of the imagination makes their actual meaning obvious. It's quite literally the opposite...
jahsome
·5 tháng trước·discuss
Step into any Walmart and look at the carts in the customer service section full of just-returned merchandise, waiting to be returned to the shelves. You might be surprised with what you see.
jahsome
·5 tháng trước·discuss
> but would you drive to a store you've never heard of before /just/ for a bar

Some people have no choice. Checking other stores and planning multiple trips is exactly what they do, e.g. those on fixed income, coupon power-users, etc.

Outside our comfy bubble here, there are a LOT more folks in that camp than those buying luxury goods.
jahsome
·5 tháng trước·discuss
> No one price matches for protein bars because it's a commodity item with minimal price differences (and people often have a preferred brand anyway), but they probably do for $2k laptop.

This is the most "silicon valley" statement I've ever read on this website. Perhaps I'm just being obtuse and misunderstanding, but the assertion people don't price match groceries is so, so wrong. Many, many, many people have no choice. Far more than those regularly purchasing laptops.
jahsome
·5 tháng trước·discuss
It's pretty funny how you tried to completely sidestep the accusation, but still managed to confirm it
jahsome
·5 tháng trước·discuss
Or, alternatively, you're just bad at it.
jahsome
·5 tháng trước·discuss
This is such an absolutely wild and demonstrably incorrect interpretation, I can only assume it's satire
jahsome
·5 tháng trước·discuss
I don't recall saying or even implying it was "the most kind and empathetic thing we can do" -- can you point me to where I gave that impression?
jahsome
·5 tháng trước·discuss
The difference is the airwaves are a limited transmission method. A broadcast medium is not regulated because it's dangerous, it's regulated because it's scarce.