The thing is: your inability to understand this is not my responsibility.
I am content with knowing what I know and more people joining this particular abstract group makes no difference to my wellbeing or sense of satisfaction.
If they believe something is right, or even “good” then of course they think everyone else should probably do alike.
Look, I don’t even know why are we arguing over what exactly? I don’t know. Seems like truisms
I don’t even know what is exactly your opposite view on anything right now and if it indeed exists or what is the point of this exchange.
I just said basic truth - majority of people won’t change mind under influence of online strangers and if they do their convictions weren’t that strong to begin with.
You could of course provide me with data that this is not true and people change mind under online strangers persuasion all day everyday
Climate change being anthropogenic is so easy to verify nowadays that when someone has contrary conviction it isn’t because they don’t know the data.
Data won’t help it at all. It’s available two clicks away, there is no shortage of it.
People want to believe otherwise and you will never actually convince anyone on the internet using data on anything in 99% of the cases.
Persuasion is an art and most of the people on the internet have no clue how to manipulate human mind to instil beliefs.
I can give a short rundown on persuasion as non autistic individual actually having those skills:
1. Always say that you understand somebody point of view. Appear interested in what they have to say and respect their beliefs.
2. Intertwine few uncomfortable questions in their point of view, very gently and non argumentative. These are the seeds of doubt.
You are a farmer it’s like gardening and watering a flower. You must be gentle with new sprouts of doubt. Tend to the garden of new beliefs and one day they will bear fruit.
Nobody thinks this way about actual strong convictions they held like belief in god or abortion or polygamy.
This works only for very narrow set of topics about numbers and data.
Even the same academics that would change their mind quickly about some theory would never actually change their mind on their strong ideological convictions. I know it from real life examples.
Strange that it needs to be articulated so loud and clear.
So I repeat again if you changed your mind under influence of an internet stranger then it wasn’t a very strong conviction.
He has heart in the right place but questionable methods
I guess nowadays anyone can support their skills with AI and make a game in weeks vs months so he should copy paste ur idea with his mechanics and see which one gets more popular. See who will win.
I know sites you have no idea about running on pure spite and strangeness. I am banned from almost all mainstream social media for wrongthink. What do you know about underground spaces?
Hell, just few weeks ago we ddosed one of new text only social media sites for having a bad font. There is a real microcosm down there. And war.
Don't go there. People would eat you alive for breakfast, doxx and possibly hack you as soon as you would start bragging about 'intelligence'.
Nerds were bought out and turned into money and thus wife having chads. Now, the basement dwellers of today are actually tech illiterate and skillless with no charming qualities at all. Blame capitalism.
I am content with knowing what I know and more people joining this particular abstract group makes no difference to my wellbeing or sense of satisfaction.