HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

levn11

no profile record

Submissions

An Interesting Proof

techrxiv.org
1 points·by levn11·2 năm trước·1 comments

Ask HN: I would like an honest discussion about this math proof?

archive.org
1 points·by levn11·3 năm trước·2 comments

[untitled]

1 points·by levn11·3 năm trước·0 comments

comments

levn11
·8 tháng trước·discuss
my life: https://www.techrxiv.org/users/717330/articles/702287-on-fer...
levn11
·năm ngoái·discuss
i mean https://www.techrxiv.org/users/717330/articles/702287-on-fer......
levn11
·2 năm trước·discuss
https://www.techrxiv.org/users/717330/articles/702287-on-fer...
levn11
·2 năm trước·discuss
so how much do you just stare at grass and yell at the sky
levn11
·2 năm trước·discuss
I would make food shelters and start a school, a dream of mine.
levn11
·2 năm trước·discuss
it follows specifically from the form on pages 1-3. i would recommend reading it with fresh eyes after a good night's rest.
levn11
·2 năm trước·discuss
I won't reply further to this question about g, i do think i've been clear. and at this point you can be on your merry way still thinking it's wrong. but you simply misunderstood.
levn11
·2 năm trước·discuss
it's a proof by contradiction. g would divide a+b-c IF a+b-c are integers.

for n=2, g(2)=(c-a)(c-b)g_1(2) and g_1(2)=2.

So only when n=2 is it true that g divides a+b-c.

Otherwise we get a contradiction that it divides. since then, g_1(n) for n>2 is not a factor of a+b-c, we can safely assume at least one of them was not an integer.
levn11
·2 năm trước·discuss
i believe you skipped pages 1-3. g_1(2)=2 for all a,b,c with n=2. g(n) carries with it the assumption of a^n+b^n=c^n as i showed in pages 1-3.
levn11
·2 năm trước·discuss
This is only true for a,b,c that satisfies a^2+b^2=c^2.

So a=b=3 and c=n=2 is not part of the solution set.
levn11
·2 năm trước·discuss
https://www.techrxiv.org/users/717330/articles/702287-on-fer...
levn11
·2 năm trước·discuss
which part
levn11
·2 năm trước·discuss
https://www.techrxiv.org/users/717330/articles/702287-on-fer...
levn11
·2 năm trước·discuss
Exactly. I have my degree as well, so I was doing some research of my own. It’s an ongoing thing.
levn11
·2 năm trước·discuss
techrxiv.org/doi/full/10.36227/techrxiv.170629872.29614231/v1
levn11
·2 năm trước·discuss
Seems like some kind of novel approach. Looks right to me. But my math is okay, so I need better eyes.
levn11
·2 năm trước·discuss
https://figshare.com/articles/preprint/Fermat_s_Last_and_the...
levn11
·3 năm trước·discuss
PLEASE read this as this is literally about thinking of center of mass as existing in more than 0 dimensions. the book is called The Zero Point Paradox and has everything to do about singularities
levn11
·3 năm trước·discuss
They did nothing, apparently. Just kept on keeping on
levn11
·3 năm trước·discuss
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Remote: yes

Willing to relocate: maybe

Technologies: i have a masters in applied math, i know python, i wrote a book, and i am publishing a math proof. But im also in need of employment.

Resume: I will email resume upon request, apologies i dont have a url set up for it.

Email: [email protected]