> This chapter describes the current draft proposal for the RISC-V standard compressed instruction
set extension, named “C”, which reduces static and dynamic code size by adding short 16-bit
instruction encodings for common operations.
But it's odd that they do not cite Tokio. I know this isn't an academic paper, but come on have some professional curtesy and discuss the contributions made in prior art.
I've got a LimeSDR-mini (which is more economical). If you're only interested in RX, you should definitely consider the cheaper RTL-SDR. I'm just starting to learn about SDR, and am far from sending anything. I wish I had gone with an entry-level device first.
It's not so much the fork but the memory cost. Each of those subprocesses has at least one call stack = 2 megabytes of memory. 2 megabytes per connection is many many orders of magnitude more that you would use in an asynchronous server.
Not for science history. It's very hard to grasp what the hell the LHC is about. First tell me why how they figured out water wasn't an element but a combination of two.
I exclusively program on a small laptop and don't have great eyesight. Formatting code such that it only looks good on huge displays makes my life more difficult.
> This chapter describes the current draft proposal for the RISC-V standard compressed instruction set extension, named “C”, which reduces static and dynamic code size by adding short 16-bit instruction encodings for common operations.