HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

mike_ivanov

no profile record

Submissions

[untitled]

1 points·by mike_ivanov·5 tháng trước·0 comments

Common Lisp Extension for Zed

github.com
7 points·by mike_ivanov·5 tháng trước·0 comments

Common Lisp developer role Ravenpack

old.reddit.com
1 points·by mike_ivanov·6 tháng trước·0 comments

Clog and Clog Builder 2.4

github.com
8 points·by mike_ivanov·8 tháng trước·1 comments

comments

mike_ivanov
·tháng trước·discuss
"What one man built, another will always find a way to break"
mike_ivanov
·4 tháng trước·discuss
Yes. It is all about making uncertain things "certain".
mike_ivanov
·4 tháng trước·discuss
Bullshit. We have more words for flavors of bribery than for types of snow.
mike_ivanov
·4 tháng trước·discuss
Ruby is a strongly typed language. I think you are confusing strong typing with static typing.
mike_ivanov
·7 tháng trước·discuss
Opus Modus (mentioned there) is quite notably Common Lisp
mike_ivanov
·7 tháng trước·discuss
miracles happen
mike_ivanov
·7 tháng trước·discuss
Corporations play the role of gods in our society.

edit: about the same role as Greek or Roman gods.
mike_ivanov
·8 tháng trước·discuss
You didn't, but you've learned.
mike_ivanov
·8 tháng trước·discuss
Please read the article. It literally shows pandas code as an example.
mike_ivanov
·8 tháng trước·discuss
New Era. A New - think about it for a sec - Era.
mike_ivanov
·8 tháng trước·discuss
Not the OP - I think it's the same process. The difference is in what my inner narrator is doing. When I asleep it is almost always gone, and this is when I typically see things in full color. When awake, my attention is split between listening to its storytelling and the mental imagery, which I believe makes the latter more dull. I noticed that the narrator is more loud when I'm in a minor mental state, like tired or annoyed. When happy/refreshed - there is no voice in my head and I can "see" things very clearly, especially their colors. So, I started looking for ways to divert my attention from the narrator. The most effective seems to keep the narrator busy with commenting on my breath ("in" and "out"), got some boost of mental clarity from that.
mike_ivanov
·9 tháng trước·discuss
I worked with a (very nice and smart) dude who would angrily shout "CRAP!" every few minutes while working on his XUL-based project. I guess, that would teach LLMs a thing or two.
mike_ivanov
·9 tháng trước·discuss
I'd say ROS (Robot Operating System) is the closest to this ideal.
mike_ivanov
·9 tháng trước·discuss
All GUI apps are different, each being unhappy in its own way. Moated fiefdoms they are, scattered within the boundaries of their operating system. CLI is a common ground, an integration plaza where the peers meet, streams flow and signals are exchanged. No commitment needs to be made to enter this information bazaar. The closest analog in the GUI world is Smalltalk, but again - you need to pledge your allegiance before entering one.
mike_ivanov
·10 tháng trước·discuss
Self-care is being Karen since when?
mike_ivanov
·2 năm trước·discuss
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2690544/what-is-the-diff...
mike_ivanov
·3 năm trước·discuss
In my opinion, AI carries an existential risk to the humanity. It has nothing to do with Sci-Fi, but rather is a mere observation of what happens to forest inhabitants when humans come and start building houses. I live in such area. Shall we ban it? No - it's impossible. Too late.
mike_ivanov
·3 năm trước·discuss
By this very logic you should deny global warming. 1) no human-made global catastrophe ever happened before (no evidence) and 2) it's an outrageous claim with severe implications to the economy, social life, etc - so, why bother?
mike_ivanov
·3 năm trước·discuss
I'm not asking anybody to ban anything. I'm just pointing at a flawed piece of logic.

Again - there is no evidence (and cannot be! - by definition) of things that never happened before.

Forecasts and opinions are not evidence, that's it.
mike_ivanov
·3 năm trước·discuss
Let me rephrase.

There hasn't been evidence that AI doesn't pose an actual danger to human society. There are lots of predictions that it could not, or fictional scenarios where it does not. But no actual real-world cases.

See my point?