HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

ninetyninenine

no profile record

comments

ninetyninenine
·5 tháng trước·discuss
[dead]
ninetyninenine
·5 tháng trước·discuss
[dead]
ninetyninenine
·7 tháng trước·discuss
[dead]
ninetyninenine
·8 tháng trước·discuss
[flagged]
ninetyninenine
·8 tháng trước·discuss
[flagged]
ninetyninenine
·8 tháng trước·discuss
No. Divorce ruins the lives of the kids. Look at the statistics. The outcome and financial damage and emotional damage is horrid.

The problem is more that it’s normalized. I think the normalization is wrong. Similar to how North Korea normalized poverty. Marriage should be taken seriously and divorce is extremely serious. The fact that you think of it as nothing is whats out of touch.
ninetyninenine
·8 tháng trước·discuss
[flagged]
ninetyninenine
·8 tháng trước·discuss
It does fit. There’s actually science on this.

In experiments they have found that women are much more ok with sexual infidelity than men. They aren’t fully ok with it just more ok with it than men by a huge margin. There’s a huge gender difference and given how culture doesn’t differentiate this aspect in terms of teaching, logically the only origin is biological.

It fits with evolutionary psychology as well. If a wife engages in sexual infidelity a man could end up raising a child that is not his own and that is a huge evolutionary cost so men evolved to be extremely guarded against sexual affairs while for women the cost is just a man potentially raising another child. She loses resources of the man but if the man doesn’t raise another child it’s not as huge of a deal. This isn’t stuff I’m making up… it’s academic.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/10/151008083755.h...

For you to be in a polyamorous relationship you are definitely overriding your default biological drive and giving evolutionary advantages to your mate (if she is female and you male). Birth control largely eliminates this cost but the emotional states are the same in the sense that is a form of submission. Case in point: Most likely it is the female partner that initiated polyamory and the male partner who had to learn how to accept it.
ninetyninenine
·8 tháng trước·discuss
[flagged]
ninetyninenine
·8 tháng trước·discuss
[flagged]
ninetyninenine
·8 tháng trước·discuss
[flagged]
ninetyninenine
·8 tháng trước·discuss
[flagged]
ninetyninenine
·8 tháng trước·discuss
[flagged]
ninetyninenine
·8 tháng trước·discuss
Can’t wait until entire triple A games are generated by a prompt. Hopefully in my lifetime.
ninetyninenine
·8 tháng trước·discuss
The fallacy is believing that people have principals. A country is in essence people and the failure of a country is atomically identical to failure in people. When you blame the "country" you are blaming people, aka yourself.

The bright eyed idealism I refer to is the failure to recognize that when you look at your own country you are looking in a mirror.

It's not only that. The type of patriotism that people have in the US is unlike any other. No offense but the only word I can use to describe it is utter arrogance, like the US is a synonym for Utopia and the US is humanities best attempt ever at it. You see patriotism in other countries in the sense that "I love my country" but you don't see it in the sense that "My country is the greatest" like you see with Americans.

I mean to be fair you do get governments who try to get people to think that their country is the greatest but none of the citizenry really buy into it (think: North Korea). But for America, a large number of people literally think America is the greatest and this is what is unique about American patriotism. You embody it.
ninetyninenine
·8 tháng trước·discuss
[flagged]
ninetyninenine
·8 tháng trước·discuss
[flagged]
ninetyninenine
·8 tháng trước·discuss
Why does the EU need the US military? China and Ukraine mostly?
ninetyninenine
·8 tháng trước·discuss
Eh it’s not like the EU is some moral paragon either. Trade one overlord for another. I’ll stick with the overlord that’s most convenient.
ninetyninenine
·8 tháng trước·discuss
[flagged]