HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

noworld

no profile record

Submissions

A Way to Challenge the Groupthink of Scholarly Journals

wsj.com
3 points·by noworld·tháng trước·1 comments

NASA Marches Toward Artemis III Mission in 2027, Names Crew Members

nasa.gov
2 points·by noworld·tháng trước·0 comments

Scientists Precisely Edit Human Embryo DNA. Are 'Engineered Babies' Next?

news18.com
3 points·by noworld·tháng trước·0 comments

Ukraine captures enemy Russian position using only robots

nypost.com
7 points·by noworld·3 tháng trước·0 comments

The Emperor Protects: A Warhammer 40k Musical

youtube.com
3 points·by noworld·3 tháng trước·0 comments

Colosseum gets a fresh look recreates the footprints of long-gone columns

apnews.com
4 points·by noworld·4 tháng trước·0 comments

We're Not Ready for Superintelligence

youtube.com
3 points·by noworld·9 tháng trước·0 comments

comments

noworld
·2 tháng trước·discuss
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/u-s-special-forces-won-409k-bet...

Another indicator we could track.
noworld
·2 tháng trước·discuss
One time I wrote a game in English.
noworld
·2 tháng trước·discuss
Ban the trading and upping the base pay would probably improve accessibility.
noworld
·2 tháng trước·discuss
https://status.claude.com/
noworld
·4 tháng trước·discuss
‘Unlike most city building games, I'm Sorry Did You Say Street Magic specifically prohibits creating a map due to the historical connections between map-making and colonialism.”

Everyone delete your maps app.
noworld
·4 tháng trước·discuss
Like something out of Fallout
noworld
·4 tháng trước·discuss
Man, if there were only something more reasonable... something in-between letting them spy at will and concentration camps. Hmmm, maybe we will think of something eventually.
noworld
·5 tháng trước·discuss
[flagged]
noworld
·6 tháng trước·discuss
"extraordinary claims/extraordinary evidence" isn't scientific rigor, it's adding qualifiers to make the evaluation of the claim and evidence more subjective.
noworld
·6 tháng trước·discuss
Ah, since the claim contradicts materialism, you get to make up a scenario, present no evidence, then put the burden on the other side. Got it.

There's literally extraordinary evidence in the PDF, you just don't like it.
noworld
·6 tháng trước·discuss
I don't think there's a "guarantee" that it wasn't backdated, but there isn't any evidence of that either.
noworld
·6 tháng trước·discuss
Can you give me some evidence that this document was backdated? I'm not saying the government isn't shady AF, but I just wonder what's behind the immediate jump to "this has to be BS" rather than keeping an open mind.
noworld
·6 tháng trước·discuss
The first PDF is the record of a remote viewing session from 2 days before the USS Stark incident, and it is eerily similar to the incident. The feelings and "atmosphere" (can't think of a better word for it) sound like what you might expect on a ship being attacked by a random missile.

For example:

1. The drawing on p. 7 looks like the superstructure of a warship.

2. The next few pages might describe what it feels like to wonder if your ship is actually under missile attack.

3. On page 10 it records "aircraft--large, multiengined; distant; orbiting; distraction controlled, directed. 'Under orders.'" This USNI article has a little more detail on the AWACS plane detecting the incoming attack: https://www.usni.org/magazines/naval-history-magazine/2017/j...

There are other similarities, but the CIA report predates the attack, which is especially strange.
noworld
·6 tháng trước·discuss
I always thought this was interesting.

May 15, 1987: https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00789R0017000...

May 17, 1987: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Stark_incident
noworld
·6 tháng trước·discuss
I never noticed that the floor of the BoP appears to be mounted on a shock-absorbing suspension
noworld
·9 tháng trước·discuss
[flagged]