HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

orlovs

no profile record

Submissions

The End of Industrial Society

palladiummag.com
2 points·by orlovs·4 năm trước·0 comments

comments

orlovs
·4 năm trước·discuss
“It isn’t the mountain ahead that wears you out — it’s the grain of sand in the shoes”
orlovs
·4 năm trước·discuss
Nice! Worth reading?
orlovs
·4 năm trước·discuss
Nuclear is slow to build as we dont have much experience to build it. More we will build it, the better we will become in it
orlovs
·4 năm trước·discuss
I love this reply. We can go even further. If we would approach air safety in such way as Nuclear, then de Havilland DH.106 Comet would be first and last commercial jet.

Nuclear fision reactors safety technology have moved further. There are challenges, but we havent even tried to solve them fully (as we were busy improving gas burning efficiency)
orlovs
·4 năm trước·discuss
Interesting would be to see what was estimations to fix previous/improve solution, develop new one or buy Splunk.
orlovs
·4 năm trước·discuss
+many. There are plenty good Enterprise software with bad rep. You can spend a lot of engineering talent to rebuild what is already solved or just buy boring tech. Splunk by definition is boring and with Twitter scale makes sense. Twitter is not too big, its decently sized.
orlovs
·4 năm trước·discuss
Defining monopoly by marketshare is shallow. Best monopoly is when your customers switching costs are high. Thats why some of FAMG is with so good friends with Lawmakers. To provide political protection.

I am not from US, but what I see from my experience there is one huge problem with mergers (besides all other): too big to fail. If you become systematical player like big banks and if you intentionally or non-intentionally get in trouble. You will be bailed out, not go bankrupt. This turns on God mode for Corporations, this create intention become reckless. If big banks would not be bailled out in 2008. Most likely we would see at least some kind of fragmetation.
orlovs
·4 năm trước·discuss
Did not get is it sarcasm or real thing. those who don't know history are doomed to repeat it
orlovs
·4 năm trước·discuss
> “Out of public view, the state-owned broadcaster has been altering old episodes of its shows to make them ‘suitable’ for modern listeners.“

I don’t get why grown ups need to be threated as kids. I am doing same for little ones, but why for grownups. Times changes, what is or not ok changes. In that case maybe adding some context commentary would be fine for those who dont know history. But erasing it is not cool
orlovs
·5 năm trước·discuss
Is Clubhouse still a thing?
orlovs
·5 năm trước·discuss
Did not thread fully, but I get your point. I know large portion hacker news audience dont like Sowell (and other Chicago school econs). In Basic Economy he defines that monopoly cant be defined “market share”, but how hard is to migrate off/open new competitors. Seing how tiktok eating userbase for fb. Its hardly defined as monopoly in social media angle. There should be more
orlovs
·5 năm trước·discuss
Nah, all will gonna be fine
orlovs
·5 năm trước·discuss
Lets face, gitlab and github valuation is based on future “ai” code autogens. Brave new world