HackerLangs
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

paulmist

no profile record

Submissions

Is This Prime

isthisprime.com
3 points·by paulmist·2 tháng trước·1 comments

A New Way to Synthesize Peptides (2024)

science.org
2 points·by paulmist·4 tháng trước·0 comments

State of VLA Research at ICLR 2026

mbreuss.github.io
1 points·by paulmist·4 tháng trước·0 comments

comments

paulmist
·11 ngày trước·discuss
Even better, Qimonda was ultimately bought (alongside all their patents) by SMIC [1] who is now the Chinese memory player. For 30 million.

[1] https://newsletter.semianalysis.com/p/chinas-cxmt-is-set-to-...
paulmist
·11 ngày trước·discuss
IIRC Taiwan took a page out of Singapore's playbook and went all in on electrical engineering and adjecent fields. It was very much a long-term strategy. Germany probably didn't feel nearly as much pressure, and was already very strong in all industry.
paulmist
·11 ngày trước·discuss
> “Semiconductors, physical AI, and AI data centers are the triple axis for a great leap forward.”

Not the best wording... I wonder how serious this announcement is.
paulmist
·16 ngày trước·discuss
Personal anecdote on ROI - I was at an early stage startup earlier this year where we had some burstable long-running GPU tasks (<100 VMs). Accross GCP and OCI we couldn't get our hands on L40S on-demand, and had to resort to T4s (released 2018). Sometimes even these were unavailable, and we would have a P4 (2016!) fallback. AWS sells A100s (2020) at $4/hr except they don't even have capacity for x1 versions, you have to rent x8.
paulmist
·19 ngày trước·discuss
I think you're confounding streaming with the rise of solo-queue but cooperative (CS:GO, LoL...) games around 2010. Both were enabled by cheaper computing and alllowed competitive ladders to scale to millions of players. Games where you have to queue with a pre-made team (or pro teams for that matter) are considerably less toxic. Toxic streamers are more of a consequence of an already toxic community.
paulmist
·20 ngày trước·discuss
I think that's a normal evolution of these games? In the end they are cooperative so your teammates depend on you. Although you'll find plenty of people at the top of the ladder spamming werid strategies and being successful.
paulmist
·21 ngày trước·discuss
I wonder if we'll start seeing Amazon/Google/Apple completely verticalize their chip production (TPU/Tranium/M series/Graviton...) and buy (parts of) Intel. Their capex is already a trillion a year, surely it'd make sense to compete with TSMC/Samsung/SK Hynix?
paulmist
·21 ngày trước·discuss
Can anyone suggest some ways to understand automation trends in manufacturing? Watching factory tours on youtube has been super interesting.
paulmist
·21 ngày trước·discuss
Do you think humanoids would be a fit on assemblying the assembly line itself? To my limited knowledge a lot of setting up the factory is making sure your line works as expected with X 9s reliability. Here dexterous humanoids are this _universal_ virtual-to-physical interface and, akin to Auto Research, could run assembly line experiments autonomosuly?
paulmist
·22 ngày trước·discuss
I first saw Noam on Dwarkesh’s podcast together with Jeff Dean. Recommend if you want a taste of what’s Google’s folks take on things.

https://youtu.be/v0gjI__RyCY?is=nz77XP4KiJy7L1AX
paulmist
·25 ngày trước·discuss
According to IEA[1] most capacity in Europe is from South Korean companies.

[1] https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/share-of-manu...
paulmist
·28 ngày trước·discuss
Aren't biggest Qwen 3.7 closed? I don't suspect China's policy here would be anything but ruthless.
paulmist
·28 ngày trước·discuss
It shows the same for this thread.

https://imgur.com/a/EOWWUbD
paulmist
·28 ngày trước·discuss
I do agree with the skepticism in this thread. But, if we assume Fable/Mythos really are that good (=easy to misuse) and thep keep getting better, what similar responses (signals) would you expect to see going forwards?
paulmist
·tháng trước·discuss
Knowing the question is half of the answer. LLMs are great at scoping your context and answering precisely what you asked; it's also why they go off the rails when they misunderstand a part of your question. Incidentally, they're great at "knowing" and reaching for knowledge.

Humans have the advantage of perspective. We always lack some knowledge and answer broadly. This is bad if you have a particular goal in mind, but better if you're just generally learning, because you see more and learn to discriminate the correct from the wrong. And most importantly, being wrong is part of human ingenuity - because sometimes we turn something "obviously" wrong into something right.
paulmist
·2 tháng trước·discuss
Why would it kill PC? There will always be hobbyists, e.g. I can't imagine pro e-sports players running on a Mac. Personally, half of the reason I moved away from Windows is Microsoft stalling/degrading Windows experience.
paulmist
·2 tháng trước·discuss
I think it's the opposite. Sure in short term hobbyists are getting squeezed, but the amount of capital that they can put into pushing the edge is small compared to Fortune 500. Sooner or later hobbyists will benefit, especially if the market crashes.
paulmist
·2 tháng trước·discuss
Can you give some context the grad student union and how it intends to fight the explotatiove nature of the academia?
paulmist
·3 tháng trước·discuss
At $15/GB of HBM4 the 331.8TB of HBM4 per pod is 5 million...
paulmist
·3 tháng trước·discuss
I think author's point is that wealth drives investment which drives economic growth. In the case of lavish funerals - warranted in kinship societies - the wealth is spent on relatively unproductive investments bearing high opportunity cost. The corollary and author's secondary point is the ineffective resource allocation e.g. through nepotism.

My main (oversimplified!) takeaway from the article is that kinship societies prioritize inherently local processes that inhibit global processes. For example, they prefer keeping internal cohesion through ritual celebration rather than maximizing economic upside through education and specialization. This makes sense - the latter requires a higher degree of trust and stability. Increasing the degree of trust and stability seems to be an evolutionary process. I found Jared Diamond's Guns, Germs, and Steel [1] to give some amazing insights about this.

[1] https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1842.Guns_Germs_and_Stee...