HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

razcle

no profile record

Submissions

Anthropic Launches Claude Managed Agents

wired.com
2 points·by razcle·3 tháng trước·0 comments

Dario Amodei Statement on American AI Leadership

anthropic.com
5 points·by razcle·9 tháng trước·0 comments

LLMs misaligned on one area are misaligned everywhere

emergent-misalignment.com
5 points·by razcle·năm ngoái·0 comments

AI is blurring the line between PMs and engineers?

humanloop.com
53 points·by razcle·năm ngoái·58 comments

Zvi on Grok

thezvi.substack.com
3 points·by razcle·năm ngoái·1 comments

Humanloop is moving to general availability

humanloop.com
11 points·by razcle·2 năm trước·1 comments

Show HN: Coworker – An Open Source AI assistant for your company Slack

github.com
3 points·by razcle·3 năm trước·1 comments

Llama Is Expensive

cursor.so
14 points·by razcle·3 năm trước·9 comments

Cheese, Rats and Giffin Goods

timharford.com
2 points·by razcle·3 năm trước·0 comments

Peter Singer on utilitarianism, influence, and controversial ideas

conversationswithtyler.com
70 points·by razcle·3 năm trước·126 comments

Invisible Indirect Injection: A Puzzle for ChatGPT

kai-greshake.de
2 points·by razcle·3 năm trước·0 comments

Why universities are making us stupid

newstatesman.com
29 points·by razcle·3 năm trước·3 comments

Atrophysics and Stale Beer

salon.com
12 points·by razcle·3 năm trước·3 comments

[untitled]

1 points·by razcle·3 năm trước·0 comments

OpenAI's plans according to sama

humanloop.com
313 points·by razcle·3 năm trước·258 comments

Atrophysics and stale beer

salon.com
2 points·by razcle·3 năm trước·0 comments

I asked ChatGPT to control my life

vice.com
2 points·by razcle·3 năm trước·0 comments

The Optimization Sink Hole

annehelen.substack.com
1 points·by razcle·3 năm trước·0 comments

[untitled]

1 points·by razcle·3 năm trước·0 comments

[untitled]

1 points·by razcle·3 năm trước·0 comments

comments

razcle
·năm ngoái·discuss
https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5121/date-of-artificial-...
razcle
·năm ngoái·discuss
Ok I think I need to go into more depth on the examples.

I think HN knows that anyone can prompt LLMs. I do think its interesting though that this has allowed PMs/SMEs to direclty influence products that are deployed to millions of people. That seems genuinely novel. Maybe I over egged it
razcle
·năm ngoái·discuss
Hey Tombert,

wrt did you read the article? I was quite specific about the ways I think LLMs are blurring the lines. I don't think its true for general engineering but I do think its true for applications being built with LLMs.

Also its still very early
razcle
·năm ngoái·discuss
I think I'm just trying hard to be overly polite in the face of negative criticism and that sounds a lot like ChatGPT!
razcle
·năm ngoái·discuss
Nope :(

But I guess I need to up my game if you can't tell the difference
razcle
·năm ngoái·discuss
I agree with that. What do you think about the point thought that for LLM agents and applications, prompts and tool definitions might matter more than code?
razcle
·năm ngoái·discuss
Hi,

I totally agree that we're not at a point where AI can write most code. Though, I didn't ever say that. I just think its blurring the boundary between engineers and PMs with both taking on more of the others role.

Also, it shouldn't be surprising that the product we're building is aligned with what we believe about the world :)

R
razcle
·năm ngoái·discuss
Hi Hexator,

OP here. Thanks for the (harsh!) feedback, I'll take it in a growth mindset.

The post does genuinely reflect my experiences and I do believe what I said.How would you advise I change the post to make it better?

Which parts do you think are untrue?

Thanks!
razcle
·3 năm trước·discuss
Not the OP but can confirm that Humanloop has full support for OpenAI function calling.
razcle
·3 năm trước·discuss
I think I worded this poorly. What he said was that a lot of people say they want open-source models but they underestimate how hard it is to serve them well. So he wondered how much real benefit would come from open-sourcing them.

I think this is reasonable. Giving researchers access is great but for most small companies they're likely better off having a service provider manage inference for them rather than navigate the infra challenge.
razcle
·4 năm trước·discuss
Reading this atm. About half way through and already it's one of my favourite books. Would love to contribute to the notes if you're accepting PRs
razcle
·4 năm trước·discuss
Hi Raza here, one of the other co-founders.

I know that HN likes to nerd out over technical details so thought I’d share a bit more on how we aggregate the noisy labels to clean them up.

At the moment we use the great Skweak [1] open source library to do this. Skweak uses an HMM to infer the most likely unobserved label given the evidence of the votes from each of the labelling functions.

This whole strategy of first training a label model and then training a neural net was pioneered by Snorkel. We’ve used this approach for now but we actually think there are big opportunities for improvement.

We’re working on an end-to-end approach that de-noises the labelling function and trains the model at the same time. So far we’ve seen improvements on the standard benchmarks [2] and are planning to submit to Neurips.

R

[1]: Skweak package: https://github.com/NorskRegnesentral/skweak [2] Wrench benchmark: https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.11377