This seems to me like a strategy to keep pushing peoples belief in the power of AI therefore making their company more valuable (just before the IPO). They want us scared of AI because that makes them more powerful.
This is very unfair for people that cannot have children. On one side we have the people that can't for biology reasons, on the other those who don't have the economic stability to support a functional family. Also, adopting costs can be very high so it is not an option for many. I won't definitely be voting political parties promoting these measures. There must be other ways.
Just so you know, some doctors recommend being careful with melatonin for kids since it’s a hormone and there’s not a ton of research on long-term effects. They say it might disrupt sexual development during adolescence. Kids produce more melatonin naturally and it is though that a reduction in melatonin production during adolescence is actually what triggers pubertal development. Might be worth looking into a bit more before making it something regular.
This study is just another case of confusing correlation with causation, wrapped in a scary headline to grab attention.
The problem here is that they compared people who were already sick enough to need long-term melatonin prescriptions with those who weren’t. That’s not testing melatonin’s effects, it’s just showing that people with serious health problems (like chronic insomnia, depression, or anxiety) tend to have worse outcomes. And surprise, those same conditions are already known to increase heart risks.
Here’s the kicker: in the US, melatonin is over-the-counter. So their "non-melatonin" group probably included plenty of people using it anyway (they just didn’t have a prescription on record).
No info on doses, no explanation of how it might actually cause heart issues, and it’s not even peer-reviewed, it's just a conference abstract. Even the AHA expert they quoted sounds pretty skeptical (but of course, the press release still makes it sound like melatonin is the villain).
Honestly, if you wanted to design a study that would produce misleading results, you’d do exactly this: use observational data, ignore selection bias, and skip adjusting for how severe people’s conditions were. The real takeaway is that people with chronic insomnia have worse health. Groundbreaking stuff (not), applause.