HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

ripdog

no profile record

comments

ripdog
·5 tháng trước·discuss
So, devuan?
ripdog
·6 tháng trước·discuss
Windows has containers?
ripdog
·8 tháng trước·discuss
I'd argue that's more because the average person has no interest in installing a new OS, or even any idea what an OS is.

Most people just keep the default. When the default is Linux (say, the Steam Deck), most people just keep Linux.
ripdog
·10 tháng trước·discuss
Because latency matters when gaming in a way which doesn't matter with AI inference?

Plus cloud gaming is always limited in range of games, there are restrictions on how you can use the PC (like no modding and no swapping savegames in or out).
ripdog
·10 tháng trước·discuss
AFAIK it's not really possible to implement Everything in Linux because Everything relies on reading the entire file list at once from the NTFS metadata, allowing it to index at incredible speed. On Linux, there are dozens of filesystems which likely make it impossible to achieve the same.

That said, I do wonder why Linux gone search is always so slow even on indexed files.
ripdog
·11 tháng trước·discuss
It's incredibly obnoxious when people type "in my country" as if we're all supposed to just... know where they live. It's also incredibly common. Why do people do this?
ripdog
·3 năm trước·discuss
I'm really sorry for dogpiling on your setup here, but why keep wav files rather than flac? Flac files are lossless compression, so you can always get the exact same wav out of them, they take less disk space and they can hold Metadata. Flac support is also really common these days.
ripdog
·7 năm trước·discuss
I'm no expert on quitting smoking, but I understand that vaping is much more effective than other nicotine supplement methods because it replicates the physical habit of smoking, the inhaling and exhaling of the vapor.
ripdog
·8 năm trước·discuss
I have no idea why you think ISPs would do something like that. American ISPs are anti-consumer to the hilt. They've been caught numerous times INJECTING ads into unencrypted http connections. Ads cause ISPs no issue whatsoever. Why would they block ads?

Also, Firefox has excellent extension support for browser-level adblocking. No ISPs I'm aware of do any kind of adblocking. If there is no ISP adblocking around, how on earth could DNS-over-HTTPS be a anti-adblocking move?!

I have no idea how you managed to convince yourself that ISPs are anti-ad pro-consumer crusaders while Mozilla are some kind of evil corporation trying to thwart their efforts. The reality is the exact opposite.