My relationship to subscriptions has changed since I started using https://kill-the-newsletter.com/ . To show up in my inbox demanding my attention is a big privilege I'm not willing to give away so easily anymore.
The only thing that stops me from switching to jujutsu is that lazygit already paves through all these paper cuts pretty well, and I'd miss their custom patches feature.
Another org banning AI code for uncertainty regarding copyright. As a non-law expert, what is the path out of this? Will no one know whether AI generated code is safe until it's tested in court?
Codebases that are too big for the context window and not properly isolated modules. It can't keep track of everything.
Also any situation where the context window is even remotely close to being full. At 80% the degradation is noticeable enough to make me start from scratch
I've been finding it fascinating to see the different approaches to this by the big players. I would've definitely expected Wikipedia to have a blanket ban (even if hard to enforce), but it seems like they are allowed as long as you're not just generating the full article
Human oversight: The use of AI must always remain under human control. Its functioning and outputs must be consistently and critically assessed and validated by a human.