This is terrifying. The article accurately describes how the drive to build satellite mega-constellations (Starlink, etc.) has become a direct threat to science and security.
If the simulations are true and satellites will ruin up to 96% of images from orbiting telescopes, and potentially obscure near-Earth asteroids, we are facing a crisis.
This conflict between communications and astronomy demands immediate, international regulation. Technological progress cannot come at the expense of global planetary security and fundamental scientific research. Companies must be held accountable for polluting the orbit.
A brilliantly described story that painfully exposes the problem: how can we trust code and configuration reviews when experts are being undermined in favor of a ChatGPT answer? I agree that it is crucial to close this 'knowledge gap' between what developers think they understand and the reality of the situation.
You mentioned the need to create new guidelines for non-technical people using AI. Do you see a chance for the LLMs themselves to be equipped with more effective 'Guardrails' in the future? Specifically, 'Guardrails' that, in critical security matters, would require the user to provide references (e.g., a link to official documentation) before the model delivers a categorical verdict?"
gaming chair, it's really comfortable, so I can sit longer without back or neck pain
insurance for headphones, usually the ones I had would break after about 2 years, just after the warranty, after buying insurance I don't have to worry about that for the next 5